AR3-GP wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 17:39Mclaren says their strength is slow corners. Weak in medium and high speed.
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... n-analyse/Looking at the GPS data, you can clearly see that Ferrari is very competitive in the corners. You could see that here in Montreal too, in the first sector. It also comes down to handling the kerbs well. Ferrari mainly loses time on the straights. But there aren't many of those in Monaco. That's why Lando is right to see Ferrari as the favourite for pole position in Monaco. At the current stage of development, the McLaren is better suited to slow corners than to medium- and high-speed corners. Ferrari and Mercedes are superior to us there. That should put us in a good position for Monaco
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/a-re ... /10827689/What’s interesting is that while team principal Andrea Stella told reporters in Canada that the MCL40 is reasonably strong in slow corners, and could be expected to perform well around a circuit like Monaco, Norris’s expectations were different. Indeed, he had thought ahead of the event that the fourth row was his most likely destination.
“I think just a slight difference of opinion,” Norris said in Monaco when pressed on this topic.
“Obviously I'm the one driving the car, so I can tell the difficulty of extracting lap time, how difficult it was already last [race] weekend in Montreal.
Bingo. I expected them to lock out the front row before Friday, given the specific characteristics of the McL40.Emag wrote: ↑07 Jun 2026, 11:08This car is quite peculiar. They're doing things differently than the others and for the first time in a while, it seems like they're the ones in the wrong (for the time being).
What's coming out of them doesn't really align with what's being observed either. The MCL40 has shown anything but good tire life. Ever since the pre-season that was literally sticking out as a sore thumb with the way they were dropping off towards the end of the long run stints. But it depends by what Stella considers gentle on the tires I suppose.
On the other side, this is the shortest car (wheelbase-wise) out of the top 4 and they also have, by far, the shortest gear ratios. On paper it seems like this car should have been almost perfect-tailored to Monaco, but they were miles off. I would have thought they would be close with Mercedes and Ferrari, with maybe Ferrari having the edge, but I underestimated Mercedes. RedBull also did better than I expected here, but I guess if Max is comfortable with the car, you cannot rule him out of anything.
FittingMechanics wrote: ↑07 Jun 2026, 13:46Marshall said that they brought some different parts for the front suspension so that the car can make the hairpin, maybe this hurt the car more.
But overall it's probably that they don't have enough load on the front, leading to them being unable to warm the fronts. This would fit with their choice to go with inters in Canada (if they can't warmup they would be hurt by cold mediums more than the rest).
Unfortunately new front wing didn't seem to work so they are running a half upgraded car which isn't ideal. Hopefully they resolve that soon.
They didn't plan to run the new one this weekend, it was always just an evaluation. Hopefully they figure it out.De Wet wrote: ↑07 Jun 2026, 14:21FittingMechanics wrote: ↑07 Jun 2026, 13:46Marshall said that they brought some different parts for the front suspension so that the car can make the hairpin, maybe this hurt the car more.
But overall it's probably that they don't have enough load on the front, leading to them being unable to warm the fronts. This would fit with their choice to go with inters in Canada (if they can't warmup they would be hurt by cold mediums more than the rest).
Unfortunately new front wing didn't seem to work so they are running a half upgraded car which isn't ideal. Hopefully they resolve that soon.
FW a work in progress.
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/mcla ... ved-again/