How misleading is this stat ? It's data, neverthless, but doesn't say that the top two got to use an extra set of tyres.
- Login or Register
No account yet? Sign up
Considering Hamilton was on the same strategy and looked like the fastest car it's actually quite useful. Basically they (Verstappen) lacked half a second of race pace to the front. So a decent chunk of time but not horrifying given that it's a track that really shouldn't suit the RB22 in its current state.venkyhere wrote: ↑14 Jun 2026, 22:16https://imgbb.com/
How misleading is this stat ? It's data, neverthless, but doesn't say that the top two got to use an extra set of tyres.
And, in many cases, ignore history. F1 didn't start in 2015.Rikhart wrote: ↑14 Jun 2026, 21:09All you have to do is stop wondering and pay attention to what happens on track, across several completely different regulation sets, etc. Also listen to what the people involved in the sport say, like team principals.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑14 Jun 2026, 20:55GOATs? A number of former champions in both sports might be wondering how those two are better than others in the histories of both sports...avantman wrote: ↑14 Jun 2026, 20:34https://ibb.co/wFQCMw37
The two GOATs and in many ways very similar characters and even career paths. It wasn't easy for either of them to get a breakthrough. Is Nole a fan as we are?
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics".venkyhere wrote: ↑14 Jun 2026, 22:16https://imgbb.com/
How misleading is this stat ? It's data, neverthless, but doesn't say that the top two got to use an extra set of tyres.
No it didn't, but comparing athletes between eras is extremely difficult if not impossible. This applies to basically all sports.
