2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
FW17
189
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

FIA should have replaced the barge board with a standardized front wheel wake deflector, like the element 5 in formula e

Image

User avatar
bananapeel23
34
Joined: 14 Feb 2023, 22:43
Location: Sweden

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

FW17 wrote:
19 Jul 2026, 14:29
FIA should have replaced the barge board with a standardized front wheel wake deflector, like the element 5 in formula e

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag ... N9sfs&s=10
The bargeboard is the single most interesting aerodynamic element on an F1 car. Getting rid of it would be a massive shame. Even the pseudo-bargeboard we have now is the most interesting piece of the car.

User avatar
venkyhere
45
Joined: 10 Feb 2024, 06:17

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

FW17 wrote:
19 Jul 2026, 14:29
FIA should have replaced the barge board with a standardized front wheel wake deflector, like the element 5 in formula e

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag ... N9sfs&s=10
The whole point of 'open wheel formula' in general and the 'inwashing bargeboard' in particular for 2026, is to present an aerodynamic challenge to the designer. That's the whole point of F1, to make the engineering 'hard'.

User avatar
FW17
189
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

venkyhere wrote:
19 Jul 2026, 14:42
FW17 wrote:
19 Jul 2026, 14:29
FIA should have replaced the barge board with a standardized front wheel wake deflector, like the element 5 in formula e

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag ... N9sfs&s=10
The whole point of 'open wheel formula' in general and the 'inwashing bargeboard' in particular for 2026, is to present an aerodynamic challenge to the designer. That's the whole point of F1, to make the engineering 'hard'.
If hard is the case, then the whole listed parts and customer engine should be abandoned by FIA.

User avatar
bananapeel23
34
Joined: 14 Feb 2023, 22:43
Location: Sweden

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

FW17 wrote:
20 Jul 2026, 12:33
venkyhere wrote:
19 Jul 2026, 14:42
FW17 wrote:
19 Jul 2026, 14:29
FIA should have replaced the barge board with a standardized front wheel wake deflector, like the element 5 in formula e

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag ... N9sfs&s=10
The whole point of 'open wheel formula' in general and the 'inwashing bargeboard' in particular for 2026, is to present an aerodynamic challenge to the designer. That's the whole point of F1, to make the engineering 'hard'.
If hard is the case, then the whole listed parts and customer engine should be abandoned by FIA.
Cost is also a factor to be considered. Some off the shelf parts are necessary to make F1 work within the confines of the cost cap.

User avatar
FW17
189
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

bananapeel23 wrote:
20 Jul 2026, 13:33
FW17 wrote:
20 Jul 2026, 12:33
venkyhere wrote:
19 Jul 2026, 14:42


The whole point of 'open wheel formula' in general and the 'inwashing bargeboard' in particular for 2026, is to present an aerodynamic challenge to the designer. That's the whole point of F1, to make the engineering 'hard'.
If hard is the case, then the whole listed parts and customer engine should be abandoned by FIA.
Cost is also a factor to be considered. Some off the shelf parts are necessary to make F1 work within the confines of the cost cap.
Teams that are worth 3 billion do not have the capability to build their owin gearbox and suspension components.

User avatar
djos
130
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

FW17 wrote:
20 Jul 2026, 14:05
bananapeel23 wrote:
20 Jul 2026, 13:33
FW17 wrote:
20 Jul 2026, 12:33


If hard is the case, then the whole listed parts and customer engine should be abandoned by FIA.
Cost is also a factor to be considered. Some off the shelf parts are necessary to make F1 work within the confines of the cost cap.
Teams that are worth 3 billion do not have the capability to build their owin gearbox and suspension components.
Money that only exists on paper is hard to spend!
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
FW17
189
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

djos wrote:
20 Jul 2026, 14:13
FW17 wrote:
20 Jul 2026, 14:05
bananapeel23 wrote:
20 Jul 2026, 13:33


Cost is also a factor to be considered. Some off the shelf parts are necessary to make F1 work within the confines of the cost cap.
Teams that are worth 3 billion do not have the capability to build their owin gearbox and suspension components.
Money that only exists on paper is hard to spend!

It is unwillingness to spend on the business, but the owners can spend on themselves.