They had the pace but chewing through the tyres way quicker.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑26 Jul 2026, 18:11I really don't think Ferrari had pace to challenge. On hards they couldn't match Verstappen.
Oh please... They can't win either way. There are already trolls claiming that Oscar was robbed. They would have been torched if they had swappedAR3-GP wrote: ↑26 Jul 2026, 18:49But there's something still off about Mclaren pit wall. They are sleeping too much. Lando was much faster than Oscar. It could have cost them the race and they would have looked silly when Piastri retired and Lando didn't win. That is why you never allow the slower driver to hold up the faster one. You need to build gaps when you have pace to defend from race chaos and mistakes that cost time. Mclaren claim to be "team first" yet they are never making decisions that benefit the team. It's bizarre. Same story in Qatar last year.
There wasn’t _any_ wheel to wheel action between the Mclaren cars today.AR3-GP wrote: ↑26 Jul 2026, 19:11https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/merc ... /10840549/Mercedes might enforce team orders if Kimi Antonelli and George Russell risk losing victory due to their wheel-to-wheel action, its Formula 1 team principal Toto Wolff stated.
However, the team boss did make it clear that Mercedes couldn’t afford to let a Barcelona-style scenario happen again.
“Since Barcelona, we would in any case always give preference to the race victory. And if it meant that Kimi or George were ahead, this is what we would do.
So your happy to potentially cost us a win just to keep it fair between a world champion and his teammate that can’t stay within 1sec of his lap times, what a joke, this team needs to sort itself out and realise that Piastri just isn’t what they originally thought, give it a year and we will be right back in the Ricciardo situation.geogate wrote: ↑26 Jul 2026, 18:58cant agree with that. Oscar took the lead fair and square, they should race fair and square. There are limited circumstances when you do that kind of thing - today wasnt one of them. I dont believe Ferrari or Mercedes would do that either. We have seen both of them not do that this year already
Nobody is suggesting an on track swap, what almost everyone is saying is that the whole first on track get first pit needs to be gotten rid of, Norris is clear as day the number 1 driver and deserves to be treated as such, I.e preferential strategy calls etc.Ground Effect wrote: ↑26 Jul 2026, 19:36Not sure why folks on here expect McLaren to order a driver legitimately leading a Grand Prix to move aside for a team mate. We're not talking about asking a driver to give aside to allow a team mate try and catch a car ahead, but to actually relinquish a race lead? That would be awful and just plain wrong and probably goes against what the driver has in his contract. There was no clear indication that Oscar was at serious risk of losing the win, they were covering whoever needed to be covered so what was the actual problem? The best they could do was what they did, give Lando a slightly different strategy without Oscar being moved out of the way or losing pit priority.