ringo wrote:About Sutil/Lewis, he was not complaining. He was informing the team about the FI. Good data for China's back stretch.

ringo wrote:About Sutil/Lewis, he was not complaining. He was informing the team about the FI. Good data for China's back stretch.
segedunum wrote:ringo wrote:About Sutil/Lewis, he was not complaining. He was informing the team about the FI. Good data for China's back stretch.You think that if it gives you comfort. I think every man and his dog knows how decent the Force India is in a straight line by now. I'm sure McLaren learned something, but it wasn't anything about how the Force India might do on China's straights.
Unfortunately, complaining about it isn't going to help anyone.ringo wrote:That damn merc engine in the FI!! Imagine if they had an F duct?
It was very notable how out of reach the force india was on the straights and then how ordinary it was in the twisty parts.
Like I posted in another thread FI simply marginalized the f duct by using a little less wing. By the euro races everyone will have an f-duct if they want one.segedunum wrote:Unfortunately, complaining about it isn't going to help anyone.ringo wrote:That damn merc engine in the FI!! Imagine if they had an F duct?
It was very notable how out of reach the force india was on the straights and then how ordinary it was in the twisty parts.
Then there is this:Tazio wrote:Like I posted in another thread FI simply marginalized the f duct by using a little less wing. By the euro races everyone will have an f-duct if they want one.segedunum wrote:Unfortunately, complaining about it isn't going to help anyone.ringo wrote:That damn merc engine in the FI!! Imagine if they had an F duct?
It was very notable how out of reach the force india was on the straights and then how ordinary it was in the twisty parts.
Granted In a race that does not have any chance of rain The FI and the Mecedes will have to be using the same rear wing downforce levels as I'm sure FI took a real gamble that the race would be dry.
Cheers!
I hope he finds what he is looking for, Mclaren cars seem to always be more difficult to drive and find a comfortable balance, where as the ferraris are easier (except the f60)."I will be in the simulator on Tuesday, so hopefully we can sort some of the problems out," Button told The Star. "The great thing is our car is improving all the time, but I am still not 100 per cent happy with the balance of the car
I remember!! and all the greats in between. I also remember it was a different era. That is a very difficult comparison. Most informed F1 enthusiasts are very well aware of JC accomplishments through reading and video. Just because I'm on the back side of fifty-five doesn't factor into my credibility. I don't know if you were just saying it as an aside or if it gives you a position above others. Hey I saw Jimi Hendricks, Janis Joplin, Bob Marley, Jim Morrison, and other dead or dying Rock Stars. It doesn't mean I appreciate them any more than anyone else that studies their music. (BTW it cost $3.50 to see Jimi live in 1969) In the following video the narrator brings up the point that Clark really didn't like banging wheels.lebesset wrote: personally I would go further , he is going to be the equal of jimmy clark
but then most of you won't know how good that was
and I know this to be true of the Scottish Country boy.but the thing about clark was the universal acknowledgement by his fellow drivers that he was at a different level
will ever have anything like that said about him unless he dies in the cockpit, end of!Star