Since this whole debate was sparked off by Ferrari wanting to bring back the T-car because of their expensive number one driver's cock up, presumably so they have something to spend all that extra money that they probably won't have soon, I thought it was a pretty pertinent point actually.Belatti wrote:This is (or was?) a Technical Forum internetfan, so try to cope with it.internetf1fan wrote:Typical Ferrari, they only care about certain rules only if it isn't convinient for them. How about telling your drivers not to crash in free practice? That should be easy enough.
oh c'mon...internetf1fan wrote:Typical Ferrari, they only care about certain rules only if it isn't convinient for them. How about telling your drivers not to crash in free practice? That should be easy enough.
You don't need to put a name on it because I already mentioned that Schumacher was famous for being meticulous in using all the options the rules gave him. If he could work harder or do something more thorough he did that. I remember that on Friday of the Monaco race weekend he flew down to Fiorano with the collected tyre data and had extra testing hours to make sure they had optimum traction. I don't see how that can be used against him. I am the first person on this board who will agree to ban anything that unfairly helps the rich teams. But as long as something is allowed by the rules using it is clever thinking and commendable.segedunum wrote:we had ridiculous situations where they weren't just used as spare cars but were used so a team or even one driver could hedge his bets by having two cars set up differently.
I won't name names and you can align some dots and work out yourselves who the last paragraph most applies to if it will ease your sensibilities.
I would say tempt them with food and then beat them upmx_tifosi wrote:Ciro, please don't feed the trolls.
I'm pretty certain that Ferrari didn't take their F-duct to Monaco.autogyro wrote:Who says the Ferrari f-duct was not used in free practice?
What kind of calender are you using since you get 2 years from may 2010 to feb 2011??flynfrog wrote:nothing like a 2 year old post getting bumped to stir every one up
28) SPARE CARS, ENGINES AND GEARBOXES
28.1 Each competitor may have no more than two cars available for use at any one time during an Event. Any partially assembled survival cell will be deemed to be a car in this context if it is fitted with an engine, any front suspension external to the survival cell, bodywork, radiators, oil tanks external to the survival cell or
heat exchangers.
28.2 Any driver who decides to use another car or whose car has a change of survival cell following the qualifying practice session must start the race from the pit lane following the procedures detailed in Article 38.2. Under these circumstances :
- the car concerned will not have to comply with the requirements of Article 34 ;
- the car will be permitted to carry out one reconnaissance lap when the pit lane is opened for the race.