JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Pierce89 wrote: Alonso isn't any different than Lewis as far as ego or complaining. The British press and British TV commentators mysteriously steer clear of any of LH's negative comments and whinges, and just as mysteriously focus on Alonso's. I say mysteriously because the British press would surely never do anything like showing bias. I thnk surely the people on this thread are way above bias or nationalism. That would never happen surely. I must just be that Alonso is Satan and Hamilton is Christ. Surely that must be it because all the LH fanboys would never show bias or act ridiculously unreasonable.
What a load of dog feces this thread is.
+1
+2
mep wrote:Or better think about what Pique might think about Alonso.
He had to sacrifice his career for him.
Implying that Alonso was responsible for crash-gate is unfounded. Furthermore no proof exists that he any had prior knowledge of the incident. To suggest that he is responsible is your opinion and nothing more.
Lets speculate for a moment on who had the incentive to perpetrate and execute the crash-gate scandal. Who had the most to gain?
1. A driver who has two WDC under his belt, during a season where he had absolutely no chance of winning another title. After having tasted real, earned glory, he desperately pleads for his team to cheat to get him back on the top step.
2. A team (namely the man in charge of it) trying to retain one of the grid's best drivers. Proving that they can put their man on the top step may make the difference in retaining him.
3. A driver fighting for his F1 life and would do anything to remain in the sport. Conceivably such an individual would willingly participate in(or potentially scheme up) a dubious act in effort to prove that he is the ultimate team player.
I think you can see where I'm going with this. If you ponder each party's incentives Alonso has seemingly nothing to gain, in proportion to the interests of the other players involved. Obviously I have no proof supporting my theory, but which of these theories passes a "reasonableness" test?
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so" - Mark Twain