The photos in the "Most Beautiful" thread got me thinking. They were unassailable in their time, but now they have been relegated to also-rans.
Discuss.
What's with the heading? You have not explained. The only similarity is the fact that both teams are/were privateers, run by dedicated men. Other than that, there is no apparent connection.zeph wrote:The photos in the "Most Beautiful" thread got me thinking. They were unassailable in their time, but now they have been relegated to also-rans.
Discuss.
My bad. I meant the paralel that they both are privateers with a very successful past, but Tyrrell faded away and Williams seems to be on the same course.gilgen wrote: What's with the heading? You have not explained. The only similarity is the fact that both teams are/were privateers, run by dedicated men. Other than that, there is no apparent connection.
Fair enough. But Tyrrell was pretty successful in their day as well. I guess both comparos have merit, in so far as any comparos have any merit at all, obviouslygridwalker wrote:Given the fact that Williams were the most successful team of the 90s, I'd say that a comparison to Lotus would be more fair than comparing them with Tyrrel.
I cannot understand your reasoning. All teams have ups and downs. Even Ferrari went for over 21 years without a title, and some of these were very poor years. Williams have improved over the last few years. But I still cannot see why you are likening Williams to Tyrell. Please explain.zeph wrote:It could be, but they have not won a title since 1997, and their last win was Brazil 2004. Isn't it fair to say that it has been downhill since (except for maybe 2003)?
gilgen wrote: But I still cannot see why you are likening Williams to Tyrell. Please explain.
It's pretty shallow, but I thought it would be a way to start a new discussion about Williams. I do not necessarily agree with the thread title, BTW. Just trying to stir things up a little here.zeph wrote:My bad. I meant the paralel that they both are privateers with a very successful past, but Tyrrell faded away and Williams seems to be on the same course.gilgen wrote: What's with the heading? You have not explained. The only similarity is the fact that both teams are/were privateers, run by dedicated men. Other than that, there is no apparent connection.
Fair enough. But Tyrrell was pretty successful in their day as well. I guess both comparos have merit, in so far as any comparos have any merit at all, obviouslygridwalker wrote:Given the fact that Williams were the most successful team of the 90s, I'd say that a comparison to Lotus would be more fair than comparing them with Tyrrel.
Eh?WhiteBlue wrote:W4 turbos
If you know the VW 8L W16, the 6L W12, the 4L W8 you can extrapolate the 2L or 1.6L W4. Yes I would think it would have two blocks but the rational is a bit weak. It makes the engine shorter than a V4 but the need for this is not so pressing as with 16, 12, and 8 cylinders.timbo wrote:Eh?WhiteBlue wrote:W4 turbos
Twin two-cylinder blocks? Do I understand correctly?