I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

"I told you so" is shallow to say to others.

Try it with your girl sometime when you are right and she is wrong, and see how that goes over.

Anyone who thinks he is not quick is wrong, but reasons for not supporting him still legitimately remain, and are completely understandable.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

User avatar
mep
29
Joined: 11 Oct 2003, 15:48
Location: Germany

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

As long as Alonso does not get treated like the rest of the drivers there is no point to stop discussions about him.

Madnessisfame
Madnessisfame
0
Joined: 17 Sep 2009, 00:36

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

Great work by Alonso today at Monza. First pole for Ferrari in years. We hope for no tricky rain, bad start, engine failure or stupid surprises from other drivers like Vettel...and to see Massa at least behind Alonso...The fight for the champion ship will still carry a better flavors.
Enjoy the race every one

jonathan189
jonathan189
0
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 14:51

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

I have to admit this was a pretty poor race by not-Alonso's high standards. In particular, losing out to his arch-enemy Alonso must have hurt.

However, not-Alonso remains in a strong position for the Championship, having won all but 3 races.

zeph
zeph
1
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 11:54
Location: Los Angeles

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

jonathan189 wrote:I have to admit this was a pretty poor race by not-Alonso's high standards. In particular, losing out to his arch-enemy Alonso must have hurt.

However, not-Alonso remains in a strong position for the Championship, having won all but 3 races.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

'ave a beer on me, mate!

User avatar
siskue2005
70
Joined: 11 May 2007, 21:50

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

good race from Alonso here (i hate to admit this)
But he did mess up his start and almost lost the race...if it was not for Ferrari's superior pace he wouldnot have got it back

but i dont think their car will be this good when it comes to Singapore and Japan

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

siskue2005 wrote: but i dont think their car will be this good when it comes to Singapore and Japan
You may be surprised. ferrari had the 3rd fastest car for much of the season. But since Hockenheim, they seem to have found some pace.
More could have been done.
David Purley

User avatar
siskue2005
70
Joined: 11 May 2007, 21:50

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

but that might have something to do with the flexy wings and floors.....which is being clampered now....i would be surprised to even see RBR with the same kinda advantage they had in Hungary

Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

Ferrari also have no more fresh engines at their disposal, which could put them down a bit on power. At least Alonso has his Spa engine, which only has half of a wet race on it.

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

siskue2005 wrote:but that might have something to do with the flexy wings and floors.....which is being clampered now....i would be surprised to even see RBR with the same kinda advantage they had in Hungary
I dont think this is where they are getting the performance. I may be wrong, but I think they are very good under braking(which suits alonso late turn in) and they have a stable rear with the updated blown diffusor.
More could have been done.
David Purley

User avatar
siskue2005
70
Joined: 11 May 2007, 21:50

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

Maybe u are right, but lets see what will happen in the next few races

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

jonathan189 wrote:I have to admit this was a pretty poor race by not-Alonso's high standards. In particular, losing out to his arch-enemy Alonso must have hurt.

However, not-Alonso remains in a strong position for the Championship, having won all but 3 races.
Yes, but not-Alonso only lost the race because Alonso and the Scuderia used their evil black magic to be fastest all through the race. If it wasn't for Alonso, not-Alonso could have won easily.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

Miguel
Miguel
2
Joined: 17 Apr 2008, 11:36
Location: San Sebastian (Spain)

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

jonathan189 wrote:I have to admit this was a pretty poor race by not-Alonso's high standards. In particular, losing out to his arch-enemy Alonso must have hurt.

However, not-Alonso remains in a strong position for the Championship, having won all but 3 races.
I find it funny that not-Alonso, having less wins than not-Hamilton, is better positioned for the championship. So who's happier? Not-Alonso or Not-Hamilton? Also, do not-Hamilton fans hate not-Alonso's? This would be particularly ironic, given that not-Alonso and not-Hamilton supporters share 22 out of 23 drivers.
I am not amazed by F1 cars in Monaco. I want to see them driving in the A8 highway: Variable radius corners, negative banking, and extreme narrowings that Tilke has never dreamed off. Oh, yes, and "beautiful" weather tops it all.

"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future." Niels Bohr

zeph
zeph
1
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 11:54
Location: Los Angeles

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

Pierce89 wrote:
jonathan189 wrote:I have to admit this was a pretty poor race by not-Alonso's high standards. In particular, losing out to his arch-enemy Alonso must have hurt.

However, not-Alonso remains in a strong position for the Championship, having won all but 3 races.
Yes, but not-Alonso only lost the race because Alonso and the Scuderia used their evil black magic to be fastest all through the race. If it wasn't for Alonso, not-Alonso could have won easily.
Miguel wrote: I find it funny that not-Alonso, having less wins than not-Hamilton, is better positioned for the championship. So who's happier? Not-Alonso or Not-Hamilton? Also, do not-Hamilton fans hate not-Alonso's? This would be particularly ironic, given that not-Alonso and not-Hamilton supporters share 22 out of 23 drivers.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Stop this! You guys are killing me!

andrew
andrew
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 15:08
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland - WhiteBlue Country (not the region)

Re: I'm supporting not-Alonso

Post

Miguel wrote:I find it funny that not-Alonso, having less wins than not-Hamilton, is better positioned for the championship. So who's happier? Not-Alonso or Not-Hamilton? Also, do not-Hamilton fans hate not-Alonso's? This would be particularly ironic, given that not-Alonso and not-Hamilton supporters share 22 out of 23 drivers.
I'm confused. As I dislike both Hamilton and Alonso, can you confirm where I stand? :wtf: