I don't think it makes sense for a manufacturer to be purely a supplier. They don't get the exposure they need, and they have to make sure they are competitive, which means money. Renault is about as hands-off as seems feasible, and even they had to reverse course a bit and put more money into their team this year. Not that I think Porsche would need to run their own team, like Merc or BMW, etc., but I do think they'd be far better off working closely with a single team like Williams.horse wrote:Given the difficulties that the current engine suppliers have with finding customers, it's hard to imagine another one joining the mix, especially if they want to supply multiple teams.
Would Renault make way? I think that's unlikely given the technology platform is so progressive.
I guess they could look to take one customer from each of Mercedes, Ferrari and Cosworth. Force India Porsche, anyone?
What they have repeatedly said is that they aren't interested in F1, so perhaps we shouldn't put much weight on their past comments.WhiteBlue wrote:They have repeatedly said that they only want to supply engines and most likely to multiple teams.
That is not true. In the last twelve months Hans Joachim Stuck and other VW motor sport managers have confirmed several times that they want to be in F1 from 2013 if the GRE format is selected and that they will not have their own team. They will restrict themselves to an engine supplier role.Pup wrote:What they have repeatedly said is that they aren't interested in F1, so perhaps we shouldn't put much weight on their past comments.WhiteBlue wrote:They have repeatedly said that they only want to supply engines and most likely to multiple teams.
How do you define "independent" in this context? Might McLaren not feature at the top of the list now that they are a customer engine user?WhiteBlue wrote:Williams isn't the top independent team nowadays. This would be Red Bull
Not an automotive manufacturer. McLaren is automotive now. They are less likely to run Porsche/Audi engines. There would be the same clashes as with Mercedes. On the other hand Mercedes gets more milage out of the McLaren supplied engines than from their works team, which fully supports Stuck's view to supply multiple teams and not have a works effort.Just_a_fan wrote:How do you define "independent" in this context? Might McLaren not feature at the top of the list now that they are a customer engine user?WhiteBlue wrote:Williams isn't the top independent team nowadays. This would be Red Bull
AFAIK they have their own engine design in the MP4-12C. The engines are just manufactured by a contractor. And in the case of McLaren we have it from the horses mouth (Dr. Dieter Zetsche) that Merc stopped their equity holding in McLaren due to clashing interests in product lines. The McLaren group even have a seperate company called Automotive. So there can be little doubt about their nature.Pup wrote:Until the day McLaren puts their own engine in their car, they are an independent team, like it or not.
Rumor has it they're seriously considering NASCAR, probably for this reason.WhiteBlue wrote:This is likely to please VW and their idea of high return for low cost.