And for the love of all that is holy in F1, stop ruining Gerhard Berger's good name!
- Login or Register
No account yet? Sign up
There's a huge contradiction in what siskue said. First, he claims that it's soley Alonso's mistake. Then he pins the blame on Domenicali and the Ferrari team.wesley123 wrote:rather put your pro-alonsoGerhard Berger wrote:Read my explanation about what happened at Silverstone.
You also might want to put your anti Alonso agenda to one side when posting on here.
What siskue said about it is completely true, and it was proven.
Andrew, it gets quite complicated when measuring mistakes and how costly they were.andrew wrote:Have to say I am with Siskue2005 on this one. Alonso made a hell of a lot of mistakes 9ok they all did, but he made the most) and lost a championship that could have easily have been his. Accept it, move on and look to next year.
And for the love of all that is holy in F1, stop ruining Gerhard Berger's good name!
You can't seriously compare Schumacher and Alonso at all! Nor can you compare the 1997 Ferrari and teh 2010 Ferrari. Yes the 1997 car was far inferior to the Williams and to a lesser extent the McLaren but the 2010 car was not inferior. It was one of the best, if not the best towards the end of the season.Gerhard Berger wrote:For Alonso, this championship was like the 97 championship of Schumacher's. He did a great job to challenge for the title in an inferior car.
that silverstone debacle has been discussed to death and proved also, if you want to be in a denial mode please go on and do it.. anyways FIA or ferrari might have delayed the whole process, but Alonso with almost 150 GPs under his belt with 2 WDC he should have known it better than anyone on track....especially after 2008 Spa race.Gerhard Berger wrote:Your explanation is incorrect and contradictory.siskue2005 wrote: Same here, Read my explanation about what happened at Silverstone.
lol its a typo
You might want to re-read what you just wrote!
anyways edited it immediately , but u quoted me before thatthat silverstone debacle has been discussed to death and proved also, if you want to be in a denial mode please go on and do it.. anyways FIA or ferrari might have delayed the whole process, but Alonso with almost 150 GPs under his belt with 2 WDC he should have known it better than anyone on track....especially after 2008 Spa race.siskue2005 wrote:Gerhard Berger wrote:Your explanation is incorrect and contradictory.siskue2005 wrote: Same here, Read my explanation about what happened at Silverstone.
Earlier you placed at least part of the blame on Domencali and the Ferrari team, yet you still want to put the blame soley on Alonso?
Well that's your opinion, you're entitled to it. The majority in the F1 world have said that the Red Bull was the dominant car this year, and they were quickest at almost every track. The Ferrari was inferior, especially in the first half of the season. I'm not sure where you got the idea that is was the best car towards the end. Red Bull were more dominant in Korea, Brazil and Suzuka.andrew wrote:You can't seriously compare Schumacher and Alonso at all! Nor can you compare the 1997 Ferrari and teh 2010 Ferrari. Yes the 1997 car was far inferior to the Williams and to a lesser extent the McLaren but the 2010 car was not inferior. It was one of the best, if not the best towards the end of the season.Gerhard Berger wrote:For Alonso, this championship was like the 97 championship of Schumacher's. He did a great job to challenge for the title in an inferior car.
Alonso did an acceptable job in a great car but simply made too many mistakes as mentioned by Siskue. It is that simple.
hollus wrote:@ Berger, you are right. I totally agree with you.
@ Siskue, all very fine points, with lots of truth in them. I am on your side in this.
@ Andrew, fantastic judgement, in all posts.
So everyone is right. You all win the discussion.
Can we move on?
