Further to that they're limited as to the number of times they can change engine maps. So they have to complete their first lap using that 'start line' map, before the ECU lets them change to one of the others.strad wrote:they already do...How do you think they launch with next to no wheel spin?...They alter the map so they can floor it and not develop enough power to break them loose.
I doubt they were the only once to have such "option" ! Plus you have to say that Schumacher was the only one driver who was practicing starts regularly during the GP weekends, until the other drivers found out that it was useful. MAYBE the Benetton had a traction control system, but surely it was not activated at the starts since you could still see the wheels spinning. It could also be that the car had a really little amount of TC so it would not be so obvious but still giving an advantage. I don't know if it was worth the risk tho. But no proof was found !richard_leeds wrote:Why pick on McL? Many of the teams had traction and/or launch control. Most famous was Schumacher's "option 13" at Benetton in 1994
I can't believe that at this late date you would still try to argue that the Benetton did not have T.C. and or Launch Control.MadMatt wrote:I doubt they were the only once to have such "option" ! Plus you have to say that Schumacher was the only one driver who was practicing starts regularly during the GP weekends, until the other drivers found out that it was useful. MAYBE the Benetton had a traction control system, but surely it was not activated at the starts since you could still see the wheels spinning. It could also be that the car had a really little amount of TC so it would not be so obvious but still giving an advantage. I don't know if it was worth the risk tho. But no proof was found !richard_leeds wrote:Why pick on McL? Many of the teams had traction and/or launch control. Most famous was Schumacher's "option 13" at Benetton in 1994