andrew wrote:Not that I believe.
Damon Hill made a move which he has snce admitted that he shouldn't have made as it was desperate. Schumacher took the correct line as he was entitled to do so and Hill rashly lunged up the inside.
As for Jerez, explain why Villeneuve had his front left off the track before hitting Schumacher?
Monaco was driver error. Simply went too fast into the corner. It is obvious from the on-board camera that Schumachers wheel was turned to the right as normal so he was intending to go round the corner.
Something I have never understood is that these incidents which are debatable are constantly dredged up yet blatently Senna ramming Prost off the track in Japan is held in great reverence. Why is that?
Damon Hill admitted that he shouldn't have made the move as he should have patiently waited for Schumacher to retire and not have given him the chance to hit him. It was nothing to do with it being a rash move, and everything about giving Schumacher the opportunity to create a collision.
So Villeneuve hit Schumacher? Look at this picture and tell me that Schumacher cannot see Villeneuve or is not steering right into him:
That was a blatantly deliberate move and Schumacher has expressed regret since.
Monaco - could you explain why the telemetry showed that Schumacher pushed the brake pedal more than twice as hard during his 'incident' than at any other point that weekend?
And you held up the stewards verdict on the Jerez 97 incident as exonerating Schumacher. Well here's the stewards view of what he did at Monaco:
Steward Joaquin Verdegay commented, "He performed some absolutely unnecessary and pathetic counter-steering, and that lasted five metres, until there was no more chances of going through the turn normally. He lost control of the car while travelling at 16km/h. That's something completely unjustifiable."
Can you explain all that?