That's because he not the same kind of Animal as Hamilton. Vettel's all nice and bubbly, not exactly BOSS material.andrew wrote:Vettel has had his bad races. He seems to take it on the chin and accepts the blame. I don't recall him ever trying to transfer the blame when he was at fault.
andrew wrote:Vettel has had his bad races. He seems to take it on the chin and accepts the blame. I don't recall him ever trying to transfer the blame when he was at fault.
On the same note, F1technical forum doesnt represent the world's view either.Just_a_fan wrote:This might be difficult to understand, but the US is not the world. Nor is it that large a percentage of the F1 viewers figures. Lots of mpeople find things funny that septics don't. Having watched US "humour" on TV I'm not sure the US is in any position to give lessons on humour to anyone.Pierce89 wrote:I have no idea where you are from,but in the U.S. racism is a serious topic and Lewis's remarks would be considered quite tasteless.
USians don't like Lewis's humour? Tough, go invade a poorly defended, oil-rich nation while you get over it...
In regards to Turkey 2010. The fall-out mainly comes from the team announcement and Webber continuing to make a fuss of it. Vettel actually kept his head down and moved on very quickly. So yes, considering the magnitude of the situation, Vettel handled it way better than any Hamilton's cases.Holm86 wrote:andrew wrote:Vettel has had his bad races. He seems to take it on the chin and accepts the blame. I don't recall him ever trying to transfer the blame when he was at fault.
Just like last year in Turkey right??
Senna explained his actions believing 100% that he was truly correct in his point of view. People didn't agree with him of course. On the other hand, Hamilton points fingers at the drivers he crashed into, the stewards who gave him the penalties and anyone he could find reasons to blame. So bashing Hamilton? Of course!!piast9 wrote:But for the second incident... As far as I remember, the late Ayrton Senna was famous of doing stuff like Hamilton did there. As Brundle said, he used to put himself in such place that it was for the driver in front to decide whether to have the incident or not. Now Senna is called the best driver ever while Hamilton is bashed for that action.
How exactly did he take out Massa?jamsbong wrote:To me, the "Villain of the Day" would be Hamilton in Monaco race. He not only took out Massa (indirectly) and Maldonado (directly). He later blame them for not giving way so he can pass, doesn't he realise those guys are not backmarkers?
Give up the effin lie. Lewis wasn't joking until he realized he slipped, then he made a poor joke trying to cover it up. Do you really have that much of a problem with all Americans. I'm no Republican, yet you bring up oil and wars in an f1 forum. Quite pathetic.Just_a_fan wrote:This might be difficult to understand, but the US is not the world. Nor is it that large a percentage of the F1 viewers figures. Lots of mpeople find things funny that septics don't. Having watched US "humour" on TV I'm not sure the US is in any position to give lessons on humour to anyone.Pierce89 wrote:I have no idea where you are from,but in the U.S. racism is a serious topic and Lewis's remarks would be considered quite tasteless.
USians don't like Lewis's humour? Tough, go invade a poorly defended, oil-rich nation while you get over it...
It was another reckless move. He was lucky to get away with it because Schumi took a wide entry and didn't bother to cover the inside line like a normal defender in that corner.ringo wrote:Hamilton is THE BOSS.
he opened up a can of woop ass on shumacher into turn 1. Overtake of the year.
Don't hate the player hate the game.
Agreed, Vettel and Hamilton will shine here and there at the moment having som fantastic races but out of all situations that arise, Alonso is the one who handles them the best most of the time.Full_Opposite_Lock wrote:Without getting trying to get into the whole Hamilton/Alonso in equal cars thing, I think Hamilton showed that he had more raw pace than Alonso in 2007 (let's not forget Hamilton has almost certainly got faster since then). Whilst I'm not an Alonso fan, I do have a lot of respect for him. Perhaps a more complete driver, but IMHO that doesn't make Alonso the better driver in all situations.HampusA wrote:That said, Alonso is the best driver in F1 by far. He is so complete it's almost scary.
Hamilton and Vettel are still rookies, give them a few years to enter their prime which Alonso is in now.
The incident that Hamilton had with Massa today, and his interview after the race, show that he has a lot to learn. Alonso would have been better in those situations i believe.
Just wait until the RBR isn´t superior anymore. It´s very easy to stay neutral when you have a car that is above everything else on 4 wheels at the moment.andrew wrote:Vettel has had his bad races. He seems to take it on the chin and accepts the blame. I don't recall him ever trying to transfer the blame when he was at fault.