Future of Cosworth

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
Scorpaguy
6
Joined: 04 Mar 2010, 05:05

Future of Cosworth

Post

Anyone have ideas on how many teams Cosworth needs to retain in order to be lucrative? With the exit of Williams...this isn't a case of "rats jumping a sinking ship" is it? I know they havent been up to speed as yet...but how much of that is chasis/aero and not the fault of Cosworth? I for one would like to see them stay...but I wonder just how long they can hang on...esp. with the new specs.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

Cosworth - Virgin racing and HRT only?

OR they could sit it out until 2014. They are very good with turbos.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

User avatar
Holm86
249
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

n smikle wrote:Cosworth - Virgin racing and HRT only?

OR they could sit it out until 2014. They are very good with turbos.

Quite ironic since Cosworth didnt like the turbo motors when they were first introduced in formula one :)

User avatar
agip
3
Joined: 15 Mar 2010, 22:44

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

Holm86 wrote:Quite ironic since Cosworth didnt like the turbo motors when they were first introduced in formula one :)
That's true.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbB1qwhK ... &index=101[/youtube]

Jersey Tom
Jersey Tom
166
Joined: 29 May 2006, 20:49
Location: Huntersville, NC

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

This makes me wonder what teams get to know before they commit to a engine supplier - what helps them make the decision. Do the get any dyno or engineering data, anything similar?
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.

riff_raff
riff_raff
132
Joined: 24 Dec 2004, 10:18

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

Scorpaguy wrote:Anyone have ideas on how many teams Cosworth needs to retain in order to be lucrative? With the exit of Williams...this isn't a case of "rats jumping a sinking ship" is it? I know they havent been up to speed as yet...but how much of that is chasis/aero and not the fault of Cosworth? I for one would like to see them stay...but I wonder just how long they can hang on...esp. with the new specs.
Scorpaguy,

Cosworth is run as a business, not as a sporting endeavor, and they have a fairly diverse range of business interests outside of F1 http://www.cosworth.com/f.ashx?id=64524. If it is not profitable for them to be an F1 engine supplier, then they will no longer pursue that market. Regardless, they've been around for over 40 years and will likely be around for another 40 years.

riff_raff
"Q: How do you make a small fortune in racing?
A: Start with a large one!"

hpras
hpras
15
Joined: 12 May 2009, 06:15

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

agip wrote:
Holm86 wrote:Quite ironic since Cosworth didnt like the turbo motors when they were first introduced in formula one :)
That's true.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbB1qwhK ... &index=101[/youtube]
I love this video, Boffins and craftsmen in tin sheds and a fabulous line, "we don't need any computer aided design, just a calculator." Awesome.

Edit: just watched part 2.... a very young Ross Brawn.

cossie
cossie
-12
Joined: 24 Aug 2007, 17:32

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

cossie will be fine with the turbo's , if i were Renault and the rest i'd be a wary of cossie due to thier past success with turbo's the 2.65 they ran in CART adn Champcar were fricking bullett proof

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

Cosworth will be a funny one for the future. They need investment for the V6 power trains, they are starting their own KERS devision next year that will look at and develop for both sporting and non sporting needs. Their V6 will require a simmilar amount of investment to what the Manufacturers are putting in, however could get away with the same as PURE for 2014s power train development, whitch is €8m this, €10.5m next and the following and then €20m plus for 2014, then decreasing to €9m a year there after. So in other words, arround €50m from now untill and including 2014.

This is money that Cosworth may not be able to afford. However they need to get teams involves from 2013 onward, giving them money for the 2013 power plant and then money for the development of a 2014 power train.

One thing that could be going for Cosworth is that they could be taken over by a Manufacturer that wants to go racing as a engine supplier only. And by they, their F1 and partial KERS devisions.

One thing is for sure, Cosworth have a future, but it isnt looking rosey. F1 will have more power train suppliers in 2014, PURE is confirmed and Honda is looking not to mention the posible McLaren/Ricardo tie up as well. As the rumor is that from 2016 or 2018 there will be a rule where a power train supplier can only provide two teams with a power train. This will lead to at least 3 or 4 teams looking for engine provision from then.

I think that the power supply will be this then:

Renault: Red Bull/Team Lotus
Mercedes: Mercedes/Force India
Ferrari: Ferrari/Sauber
McLaren/Ricardo: McLaren/Virgin
Cosworth: Renault*/Hispania (*Team currently named Renault, Chassis change must be done for 2013)
PURE: Toro Rosso/Williams

VW are looking at 2018, GM have been looking at a entry from 2016 onward as Chevrolet and Honda have been looking as well from 2016 onward at the earliest.

Engine supply will change in the future, at present im happy with the V8s.

cossie
cossie
-12
Joined: 24 Aug 2007, 17:32

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

do not see PURE involved or getting any teams , Pollack has pissed of everyone and every team, and Cosworth rep with builing turbo engines is great,i'd take a cossie turbo engine over a Renault turbo anyday,

wesley123
wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

cossie wrote:do not see PURE involved or getting any teams , Pollack has pissed of everyone and every team, and Cosworth rep with builing turbo engines is great,i'd take a cossie turbo engine over a Renault turbo anyday,
Yet they never made a F1 Turbo engine, where Renault did
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

wesley123 wrote:
cossie wrote:do not see PURE involved or getting any teams , Pollack has pissed of everyone and every team, and Cosworth rep with builing turbo engines is great,i'd take a cossie turbo engine over a Renault turbo anyday,
Yet they never made a F1 Turbo engine, where Renault did
A) "cossie" should learn to type and spell properly before posting anything more, most annoying to see posts like his.

B) Cosworth built a 120 degree 1.5 V6 called "TEC" during 1986-87 seasons, used by Haas and Benetton I think.

C) Cosworth will surely build a fine 1.6 V6, if they have the money for it, problem will be with the gizmos MGUK and MGUH.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

xpensive wrote:Cosworth will surely build a fine 1.6 V6, if they have the money for it, problem will be with the gizmos MGUK and MGUH.
I'm not convinced by that theory. The ERS is a fairly simple spec and most power train makers should master it with moderate investment. That is the reason why they went so restrictive in specification.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

wesley123
wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

xpensive wrote:
wesley123 wrote:
cossie wrote:do not see PURE involved or getting any teams , Pollack has pissed of everyone and every team, and Cosworth rep with builing turbo engines is great,i'd take a cossie turbo engine over a Renault turbo anyday,
Yet they never made a F1 Turbo engine, where Renault did
B) Cosworth built a 120 degree 1.5 V6 called "TEC" during 1986-87 seasons, used by Haas and Benetton I think.

C) Cosworth will surely build a fine 1.6 V6, if they have the money for it, problem will be with the gizmos MGUK and MGUH.
Made a mistake there, got some intel about it over PB, they indeed made one.

And for the engine, sure they are able to do so. If it will be good? I dont now, they dont got the money to invest millions into something no team will run. We dont know which manufacturers will join the new engine formula. A team will more likely choose for a car manufacturers engine then an manufacturer outside th car business, for example Cosworth or PURE.

For example PURE with Pollock is taking a huge risk, it is likely they will go nowhere in F1, what is pollock going to do then? The investers want their money back and where does that money come from?
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Future of Cosworth

Post

- In a perfect world, Cosworth should find its way back to its liasion with Ford, or someone else, to badge their engines.

- The recovery systems will take some serious investment, 4 MJ, even if some members are beating their own drum about it.

- P.U.R.E. is covered by another thread, but obviously they have a backer yet unknown, though I believe it to be VW.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"