It would make sense if PURE is indeed backed by a serious entity, like Peugeot perhaps?Richied76 wrote:just for thought...would mclaren making a partnership with PURE make sence? If not i think its either
A) see what merc come up with
B) Inhouse in conjuction with ricardo
Very good point. even if Peugeot threw some money in the pot to get there name involved (renault/mecachrome style) to help fund a PURE + Mclaren engine. Free engines for Mclaren. It would make finacial sence to PURE aswell with big names involved..may make there engine more saleable. I'm yet to have herd anything from PURE since the change to V6's though. Anyone know if there still interested in F1?xpensive wrote:It would make sense if PURE is indeed backed by a serious entity, like Peugeot perhaps?Richied76 wrote:just for thought...would mclaren making a partnership with PURE make sence? If not i think its either
A) see what merc come up with
B) Inhouse in conjuction with ricardo
Peugeot never could stand Renault winning the way they have over the past years, why taking them on together with McLaren would be one way to deal with the situation, not that it worked out all that well the last time they tried in 1995.
Audi has quite dominated Rallying with their Quattro, and so they did from 2000 till 2005, this was with gasoline, so the 'Audis credentials in Le Mans crumbles somewhat when there´s a 50% chance of actually winning it...' imo doesnt count, anyone could have come up wih a brilliant design, good finances and a good engine could have brought on the fight.HampusA wrote:Audis credentials in Le Mans crumbles somewhat when there´s a 50% chance of actually winning it...
If you want to talk about car manufacturers that actually has dominated, and done it against the best in the world it´s Porsche you want to call, not Audi.
PFFFFFFFFFTTTTT!!!wesley123 wrote:Audi has quite dominated Rallying with their Quattro, and so they did from 2000 till 2005, this was with gasoline, so the 'Audis credentials in Le Mans crumbles somewhat when there´s a 50% chance of actually winning it...' imo doesnt count, anyone could have come up wih a brilliant design, good finances and a good engine could have brought on the fight.HampusA wrote:Audis credentials in Le Mans crumbles somewhat when there´s a 50% chance of actually winning it...
If you want to talk about car manufacturers that actually has dominated, and done it against the best in the world it´s Porsche you want to call, not Audi.
I am sure that Audi can come in F1 and win races/championships in their first season, they have shown incredibly well in any other series in their first season and with the lack of manufacturers I'd asume in F1 it makes Audi's chances even better.
Win in their first season? Hmm... the last team to claim they could do that [first RACE, in fact] was BAR. Oops...wesley123 wrote:Audi has quite dominated Rallying with their Quattro, and so they did from 2000 till 2005, this was with gasoline, so the 'Audis credentials in Le Mans crumbles somewhat when there´s a 50% chance of actually winning it...' imo doesnt count, anyone could have come up wih a brilliant design, good finances and a good engine could have brought on the fight.HampusA wrote:Audis credentials in Le Mans crumbles somewhat when there´s a 50% chance of actually winning it...
If you want to talk about car manufacturers that actually has dominated, and done it against the best in the world it´s Porsche you want to call, not Audi.
I am sure that Audi can come in F1 and win races/championships in their first season, they have shown incredibly well in any other series in their first season and with the lack of manufacturers I'd asume in F1 it makes Audi's chances even better.