Even I read that and thought, "Oh, come on!"marcush. wrote:http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/103459![]()
does anyone know what their young charger is smoking these days?

Even I read that and thought, "Oh, come on!"marcush. wrote:http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/103459![]()
does anyone know what their young charger is smoking these days?
Well Cocles, that really sums it up.Cocles wrote:The article about Costa and Willis keeps being misquoted.
Brawn didn't say that Costa was in charge of one car and Willis was in charge of the other, only that one guy was currently working on one car, while the other guy was working on the other one. That doesn't mean they're in charge of those cars.
Willis is the tech guy, of course he's going to be working on the car that's currently little more than a wire frame on a computer screen, whereas Costa is working on the car that has reached a physical representation.
I'm not in a position to dig up the article right now, but I will later if needed.
As for Korea.... uhg.
My point is that the article never said either of those guys were in charge of those respective cars, yet individuals within this thread keep speculating as if that's case.marcush. wrote:As for the wire frame..You bet they already have all constraints in their skeletton design fixed and design their cvars within what the regulations allow .I´m pretty sure a HEAD of anything does not perform this sort of work..No ?
Where'd I say that? Bell is in charge of Willis and Costa. Bell reports to Brawn. (But you already knew that.SeijaKessen wrote:Well Cocles, that really sums it up.
No one is actually in charge of anything at MGP.
You're telling me that no development is done on the car in virtual space? Really? No one sits down in front of a screen and tries to improve the car? And someone like Willis doesn't supervise this?marcush. wrote:the skelletton is derived from the technical regulations -not something you need the boss doing...He will certainly have a look ,but that´s about it.
I enjoy your speculation, but that's all this is... a construct you made up to try to explain something we have no reliable information on.I´m pretty sure Brawn was exactly on this:the two kings have both their own kingdom so they don´t have to fight each other.It was his ways of telling the public-these two have nothing to do with W03s fail as they need to work on "important stuff"...
You're inaccurately inferring that we as fans are somehow entitled to a public explanation. We're not. It'd be nice if we were, but we're not. We don't know what's going on behind clothes doors. Perhaps Brawn is taking full responsibility in front of his German bosses. Perhaps he's throwing everyone else under the bus. Perhaps he and Bell are putting on a production of King Lear for local schoolchildren. We don't know. And we're not entitled to know.People in charge? Who has taken responsibility for the fall of W03 flat on its nose?
So? If you're looking for soundbites to the press that hold nothing but clear facts, truthful explanations, and accountability, might I recommend a different planet? Where is this done anywhere? And here's the non-rhetorical question, why does it only seem annoy you when Mercedes does this?We hear of difficulty to fatom the tyres still and improvements with the latest developments , and hope for the remaining 4,3,2,1 races... but no one has stated he got it totally wrong with his claim the key to it all was tyre understanding and they have made big inroads in grasping the tyre conundrum which was the sole thing preventing them from winning over and over again.
And that, is why MGP is a failure, and will remain one.Cocles wrote: You're inaccurately inferring that we as fans are somehow entitled to a public explanation. We're not. It'd be nice if we were, but we're not. We don't know what's going on behind clothes doors. Perhaps Brawn is taking full responsibility in front of his German bosses. Perhaps he's throwing everyone else under the bus. Perhaps he and Bell are putting on a production of King Lear for local schoolchildren. We don't know. And we're not entitled to know.
JET, at this point, you can't seriously believe the current roster of kings and messiahs honestly deserves to be employed still?FoxHound wrote:Marcush
Honestly mate, you are entitled to nothing. Why should Mercedes be treated any differently from other teams?
They do poorly, and you want them to sack the whole squad. What if the fail again?
Sack them again. And if they fail again? Screw it sack them!
Along the way, you want Mercedes to publish PR that says "where are terrible, we don't know how to build an f1 car".
Not a single manufacturer has ever publicly called themselves crap. Not one. And you want Mercedes to start doing that? Please mate, it just doesn't work that way, and you know it.
And the perennial sackings.... What did it ever achieve at Toyota? And they had even more money to spend.
When you take all the emotional crap out the way, you find a team struggling to achieve results.
We have no real idea what goes on behind closed doors, but it will change.
Things have already changed, and change will continuously occur until Mercedes get the results.
It took Mercedes over 4 years to win with their engines, but they stuck by it. Imagine they had no bottle and folded because of the high profile blow ups and quit f1? In the face of poor results, and adversity at least they still have stomach for a fight.
You really believe they don't acknowledge their accountability to the Daimler board? This isn't something we'll necessarily see as fans. Accountable to the press and by extention us? Certainly not. I'll give you that. But that's not something that particularly concerns me. Their job is to win races and keep the board happy so they continue to exist. That's where my concern lies.SeijaKessen wrote:There is no accountability to anyone.
I used the term "wire frame". You then used the term "skeleton" as if it were synonymous with the concept I was referring to. I was using the term "wire frame" as a general term for the car's representation in virtual space. I'm sorry I confused you. Do I believe Willis helps oversee this stage of the car's development? Yes, of course I do. You don't? He's the tech guy... what do you think he's doing there? IT services?marcush. wrote:a skeleton is nothing more than a frame into which you are putting your actual design in - the frame really.
As a fan, you're entitled to an explanation?So we are entitled to be supplied with a public statement of yes we have spent another 300mill € but we still have no idea about how to handle those Pirellis.
Definitely. As much as I hate to see my beloved Schumacher go, things are only going to get more interesting.Nando wrote:Regardless of where about they will be in 2013 i think just the notion of having Hamilton in the team and see what he can provide will be highly interesting in of itself.