Still doesn't explain why it happens more often with Webber then Vettel.autogyro wrote:My guess is a battery cooling issues.
Adrians designs have little compromise when it comes to aero and KERS has never been the winning part of his over all design thinking.
Less power from the Renault powertrain might also allow less available aero/drag for cooling.
Without movable aero devices it is a big problem cooling the KERS batteries.
Asking the drivers to turn off KERS for a lap or so is often heard on the radios.
Is it possible we just don't hear about Vettel's kers failures over the team radio?turbof1 wrote:Still doesn't explain why it happens more often with Webber then Vettel.autogyro wrote:My guess is a battery cooling issues.
Adrians designs have little compromise when it comes to aero and KERS has never been the winning part of his over all design thinking.
Less power from the Renault powertrain might also allow less available aero/drag for cooling.
Without movable aero devices it is a big problem cooling the KERS batteries.
Asking the drivers to turn off KERS for a lap or so is often heard on the radios.
How about this: Vettel ussually qualifies more towards the front then Webber does; that would theoritically also mean he drives more in clean air. Webber has to drive more often in dirty air, which in turns brings less cooling to the KERS batteries?
No, the oil cooled permanent magnet alternator is not the same as the KERS unit.Agerasia wrote:I'm going to take a stab in the dark and suggest that the KERS unit and alternator on MW's car are one and the same thing
Red Bull have their batteries at the sides of the gearbox.piast9 wrote:Aren't the batteries placed somewhere around the driver's back? Isn't Mark taller than Seb? I think he is. In that case the batteries packaging in Mark's car may be different and more prone to cooling issues than in Seb's. What do you think?