Preventing abnormal combustion

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
asdf
asdf
1
Joined: 18 Sep 2012, 11:04

Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

Seeing as most F1 engines have a CR of around 17:1 (give or take) and the maximum fuel octane is 102, what methods do the teams use to prevent detonation, pre-ignition etc?

I'm guessing that combustion chamber and piston design has a lot to do with it as well as the formula of the fuel. Anything else?

Coatings? Super aggressive camshaft profile?

I'm sure it's a combination of factors, but I'd like to hear what everyone else thinks as I don't know all that much.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

Where did you get this CR?
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
650
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

asdf wrote:Seeing as most F1 engines have a CR of around 17:1 (give or take) and the maximum fuel octane is 102, what methods do the teams use to prevent detonation, pre-ignition etc?
I'm guessing that combustion chamber and piston design has a lot to do with it as well as the formula of the fuel. Anything else?
Coatings? Super aggressive camshaft profile?
CRs of 14:1 were given by BMW ? a few years ago
the current fuel rules (presumably modified for the benefit if the new turbo engines) seemed when I last looked to have no upper octane limit (but a minimum octane of 75, presumably to deter dieselisation of F1)
combustion has a critical element of time dependence, that is detonation simply does not take place at 18000rpm because the piston is so quickly into the expansion phase (withdrawing detonation conditions before detonation time is reached)
this was documented in the 1960s when the 125 cc twin GP Honda motorcycles were found by Honda to run perfectly on 65 octane (at these very high revs)
(DI is not 18000 rpm capable, and would presumably have little benefit at such rpm)
somewhere on this site there were references to recent Shell information that their F1 fuel is significantly less than 102 octane to help formulation for the fastest possible combustion (this a vital characteristic in F1 for 20 years now)
certainly combustion chamber coating (to minimise heat loss to coolant) helps, and the cams were changed when the rpm were reduced to the present 18000 max (ie the cylinder filling at lower rpm is relatively poor)

User avatar
strad
117
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:57

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

I ain't buying 17:1
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

strad wrote:I ain't buying 17:1
That was the gist of my post further up. :wink:
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:
strad wrote:I ain't buying 17:1
That was the gist of my post further up. :wink:
You would need to be running a proper fuel like LPG for those figures.

asdf
asdf
1
Joined: 18 Sep 2012, 11:04

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

I dunno about the CR, I must have misread something.

Edis
Edis
59
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 16:58

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

Toyota's RVX-09 for instance had a compression ratio of 13.6:1, and other F1 engines should have similar compression ratios.

F1 engines doesn't really have any problems with engine knock due to their very high speeds. The time available for the end gases to self ignite during combustion is so short that knock isn't a problem.

Thermal barrier coatings also tend to increase knock, not reduce it. This is because the end gases are actually being cooled by the cylinder head, and even the piston. End gases can reach temperatures in the region of 700 degC before the flame front arrives.

riff_raff
riff_raff
132
Joined: 24 Dec 2004, 10:18

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

Edis wrote: ....F1 engines doesn't really have any problems with engine knock due to their very high speeds. The time available for the end gases to self ignite during combustion is so short that knock isn't a problem........
Edis- While appreciate that you are trying to provide a short answer to a complex question, I think you have oversimplified the situation. The mechanism of spontaneous detonation type combustion (ie. knock) in an SI engine is not really time dependent. Instead, it is more dependent on heat transfer and chemical kinetics. What was said about the thin layer of charge mixture trapped between the piston crown and cylinder deck in the quench area at TDC having a sufficiently high rate of heat transfer to those metal surfaces such that the mixture never becomes hot enough to spontaneously ignite is accurate.

Spontaneous detonation combustion in a homogeneous charge mixture can occur virtually instantaneously. This is demonstrated by HCCI combustion in recip engines.
"Q: How do you make a small fortune in racing?
A: Start with a large one!"

olefud
olefud
79
Joined: 13 Mar 2011, 00:10
Location: Boulder, Colorado USA

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

In general, high CR is compatible with low volumetric efficiency. Optimizing power at ultra high RPM s where intake flow diminishes is one use of big number CR. The problem then is dealing with lower RPM with more optimum flow. Intake timing, throttle restriction and late DI are means of tempering such high CR at lower RPM.

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

I think it is important to remember that the 'actual' pressure of the charge is not just a result of CR.
It is mainly a result of valve overlap and cam timing.
Volumetric efficiency is not directly coupled to CR.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
650
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

...... and of course variation of ignition timing

is this used in current F1, where they seem to have quite low rpm around 9000 with nominally full throttle ?
there's also the effect of variations in mixture richness, related to useable CR
wouldn't we like to know what F1 actually does !

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
650
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

Edis wrote: Thermal barrier coatings also tend to increase knock, not reduce it. This is because the end gases are actually being cooled by the cylinder head, and even the piston. End gases can reach temperatures in the region of 700 degC before the flame front arrives.
thermal barrier coating of the piston would usefully allow it to be lighter (it would receive less radiated combustion heat)

is the combustion chamber similarly coated and, if so, why ?

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

Tommy Cookers wrote:...... and of course variation of ignition timing

is this used in current F1, where they seem to have quite low rpm around 9000 with nominally full throttle ?
there's also the effect of variations in mixture richness, related to useable CR
wouldn't we like to know what F1 actually does !
I was talking before ignition (not pre ignition).
The pressure of the unburnt mixture in the combustion chamber.
When and how you burn it is just part of the juggling act, which has been fairly simple for some time with computor control.

No magic in F1 engines.
They have no more torque than most sporty road saloons.
The trick (if there was one) was to keep the bits together at high rpm.
It will be interesting to see where the 'magic' gets applied when the maximum rpm drops radicaly in 2014.
A lot will go on the main limiting factor the direct injection.

Edis
Edis
59
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 16:58

Re: Preventing abnormal combustion

Post

riff_raff wrote:
Edis wrote: ....F1 engines doesn't really have any problems with engine knock due to their very high speeds. The time available for the end gases to self ignite during combustion is so short that knock isn't a problem........
Edis- While appreciate that you are trying to provide a short answer to a complex question, I think you have oversimplified the situation. The mechanism of spontaneous detonation type combustion (ie. knock) in an SI engine is not really time dependent. Instead, it is more dependent on heat transfer and chemical kinetics. What was said about the thin layer of charge mixture trapped between the piston crown and cylinder deck in the quench area at TDC having a sufficiently high rate of heat transfer to those metal surfaces such that the mixture never becomes hot enough to spontaneously ignite is accurate.

Spontaneous detonation combustion in a homogeneous charge mixture can occur virtually instantaneously. This is demonstrated by HCCI combustion in recip engines.
Knock is very much time dependent!

I based my answer on Douaud and Eyzats induction correlation, a simple model that can be used to predict engine knock (it is often used by engine simulation software). The model is based on the principle that knock will occur when the induction time is less or equal to the flame front arrival time. The induction time is a calculated value that is dependent on fuel octane, cylinder pressure, cylinder temperature and a few multiplier values and the flame front arrival time is of course dependent on the speed of combustion.

The heating of the endgas during combustion is actually not that dependent on heat transfer - instead it is mostly a result of adiabatic compression. First in the form of compression during the compression stroke, then as a result of the rapid pressure rise during combustion. For an engine having a compression ratio of 13:1 the compression stroke will raise the pressure in the cylinder to about 40 bar, then the combustion will raise the pressure further, in the case of a F1 engine up to about 110 bar. This will cause the unburned endgas to exceed a temperature of 700 degC and since gasoline only need 300-400 degC to self ignite it's just a matter of time until it do just that.

As the temperature of the unburned air fuel mixture increase the fuel will start to break down, pre flame reactions will occur, radicals will be produced and given enough time self ignition with a rapid heat release will follow. As a side note - tetraethyl lead actually works by inhibiting these pre flame reactions in some way.

Air/fuel mixtures don't self ignite instantly, but depending on the conditions this ignition delay will vary. That's why HCCI engines are so difficult to control. With a HCCI engine you can't control ignition timing directly, instead the ignition timing is controlled by indirectly adjusting the ignition delay (usually HCCI engines operate with very lean homogeneous air/fuel mixtures). Diesels on the other hand are easier. Diesel fuel have a high cetane number - in other words, it self ignite quite rapidly if injected into a chamber containing hot air. So with a diesel you just control the start of fuel injection, often referred to as the alpha angle, then the fuel will self ignite after a few crankshaft degrees. Still, the ignition delay is much longer at low loads and low engine temperatures. That's why diesels tend to produce a "knocking" sound at low loads, but not at high loads when the engine is warm. This knocking sound is indirectly produced by long ignition delays - in a diesel a long ignition delay will lead to a more rapid pressure rise in the cylinders since more fuel has had time to premix with air before the combustion starts. That is also why diesels these days use pilot injection, a short fuel injection before the main fuel injection aimed to reduce the ignition delay.