the point is not that it is better, it removes the same heat, the point is that it does it with less area, less power power to move it and less noisemep wrote:What???
You have to transfer the heat from the first stationary metal plate to the air, through the air gab and then back to the metal rotor.
Do you really want to tell me that this should be better than transferring the heat from a spinning rotor to air?
Still the surface area of the plates is relatively small especially when comparing to the big surface area of the rotor plates which take advantage of the air moving very quick over them.
I doubt this is better than having a huge surface area of a conventional cooler and moving some air over it for forced convection.
The thickness of the air bearing could be very small so the thermal resistance doesn't have to be that big compared to the resistance from the fins to ambient.
Sure circulating fluid in and out of the rotating part would be nice but it would take a lot more power to drive it with seals
needed to contain the fluid