2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
Post Reply
User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

piast9 wrote:
zonk wrote:Vettel the lightest. 10kg how much is worth? :lol:
And Webber the heaviest and the tallest...

Minimum weight limit helps but if you're light and small there are more possibilities for placing a ballast. Remember first days of KERS? Kubica (also the "big man") preferred to drive without it because his car with KERS had very little balast placing possibilities which compromised the handling.
58Kg, 176cm male, with at least some muscles? I call that BS!
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

krisfx
14
Joined: 04 Jan 2012, 23:07

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

FrukostScones wrote:
piast9 wrote:
zonk wrote:Vettel the lightest. 10kg how much is worth? :lol:
And Webber the heaviest and the tallest...

Minimum weight limit helps but if you're light and small there are more possibilities for placing a ballast. Remember first days of KERS? Kubica (also the "big man") preferred to drive without it because his car with KERS had very little balast placing possibilities which compromised the handling.
58Kg, 176cm male, with at least some muscles? I call that BS!
I'm sure I heard somewhere that Vettel was in the 60's. I would question the legitimacy of that picture anyway.


myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

FrukostScones wrote:58Kg, 176cm male, with at least some muscles? I call that BS!
I read somewhere that his sense of entitlement weighs 20Kg all on its own.

bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

Success ballast?

User avatar
Hail22
144
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 07:22

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

Toro Rosso Cars arrive in Melbourne:

Image

Image
If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari.

Gilles Villeneuve

sAx
sAx
1
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 13:38
Contact:

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

zonk wrote:http://24.media.tumblr.com/7adf282d1a93 ... 1_1280.jpg

Vettel the lightest. 10kg how much is worth? :lol:
Was worth quite a bit to Prost when he trumped Mansell in the Ferrari. Remember an article by Alan Henry in Motoring News at the time, suggesting that Mansell's complaints about Prost having better engines, was somewhat due to their difference in weight ie ~0.2s/lap
Integrity, Trust, Respect.

Follow me: http://twitter.com/#!/sAx247

Gerhard Berger
-1
Joined: 20 Sep 2010, 11:17

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

Donuts wrote:
RB_[Gnx] wrote:Well , I have a feeling that Red Bull might not shine as expected ..A feeling..
+1
Peter Sauber said that people who expect this are in for a "nasty surprise".

Gerhard Berger
-1
Joined: 20 Sep 2010, 11:17

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

Seems like there are some chances for rain in qualifying.

zonk
69
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 00:56

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

...well i was trolling a bit... car must weight 640kg minimum with a driver at all times. As Ray, Piast said CofG and ballast placing is an a advantage. :wink:

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

I disagree that front/back static mass distribution is helped anymore, given that teams have 292kg minimum on the front axle and 343kg minimum on the rear axle. That leaves 7kg leeway on ballast placement - which IMO every driver still can have. The only benefits are probably packaging and CofG
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
clipsy1H
-16
Joined: 12 Feb 2012, 02:21

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

i can't wait to see all cars on track again :mrgreen:. Will be a very tight season and a fight between Red Bull and rest of the team (my prediction). We know that we can't make a conclusion after first race i think after Monte Carlo-Canada we all know who's gonna fight for championship and which teams failed.
I also take a shot in the dark and place first 10 in quali.

1.Vettel
2.Lewis
3.Button
4.Grosjean
5.Rosberg
6.Fernando
7.Mark
8.Kimi
9.Sergio
10.Hulk.

User avatar
Vasconia
6
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 10:45
Location: Basque Country

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

I have missed this so much! :mrgreen:

Qualy:

1.Hamilton
2. Vettel
3. Rosberg
4.Raikkonen
5.Alonso
6.Maldonado
7. Massa.
8. Webber
9. Button
10 Grosjean

Race:

1. Vettel
2. Alonso
3. Hamilton
4. Raikkonen
5. Rosberg
6. Grosjean
7. Massa
8. Webber
9. Button
10. Perez

I think it could rain, in that case no prediction from myself hahaha.

User avatar
Guisson
2
Joined: 04 Mar 2012, 12:59
Location: Erlangen, Germany.

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

Image

Interesting...So there are chances of rain ! Maybe there is some chances of not seeing a RB on pole after all ! ( A Mercedes to do the job? )
The task is,not so much to see what no one has yet seenbut to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees. Erwin Schrödinger

sidmiester
0
Joined: 22 Mar 2012, 11:20

Re: 2013 Australian GP - Albert Park

Post

Qualy:

1.Vettel
2. Rosberg
3. Hamilton
4.Raikkonen
5.Alonso
6.Webber
7. Button
8. Webber
9. Checo
10 Massa
Race:

1. Vettel
2. Rosberg
3. Hamilton
4. Alonso
5.Raikkonen
6. Grosjean
7. Massa
8. Webber
9. Button
10. Perez

if car is good as Mercedes had in Barcelona test, I am rooting Rosberg for win...

Post Reply