You did indeed Ciro, mea culpa.
Good to see you back, you have been dearly missed around this corner of the cyber-universe.
My response was about using the engine cylinders as a compression device. Unless you were to employ some sort of variable CR system or some porting system that allowed staged compression between multiple cylinders, then you would be limited to the discharge pressure that could be achieved with the engines existing CR.xpensive wrote:Where did you get that idea, 300 psi is just 20 bar, while MDI uses 300 bar with a tank tested for 450.
My 2 c on this is that the chassis is made as strong and as light as it needs to be and no more. Furthermore, it is also made as small as it needs to be. For a usable amount of energy to be stored, the volume of air required would be substantial and the pressure required would be immense. To use the chassis as a pressure vessel would mean increasing the strength of the structure to accommodate the required pressure, plus a significant safety margin for a crash event; Imagine the carnage if the vessel was punctured in an accident. As with all of the recoverable energy storage devices there are safety issues to be considered.Desertrunner wrote:Air tank Made of Carbon fibre can be extremely light also as I see it if you were smart the tank would be a rigid part of the chassis structure so as to offset any weight gain.
If the pump sending air was anchored to the engine crank it would minimize weight increase.
Last point is that you need a variable pump so that at low pressure it will pump a lot more air and at high pressure it can still fill the tank.
Bit of smart design could mean that the same pump operates as a motor as well so not only do you have te ability to Supercharge the combustion chamber but you can also increase power with a different motor.
The maximum amount of air (energy) being stored is only limited by the strength of the pump and tank.
Tony