RS27 project manager, ING Renault F1 Team
April 24th 2007, 12.30 BST, Live from Viry
http://www.ing-renaultf1.com/en/paddock/chat/
I thought that since there is an opportunity to enlighten ourselves with the design and inner workings of a design team of an F1 engine, it might be a good idea to go over points of interest beforehand. I myself will propably not be able to participate in the webchat anyway (albeit it seems it is possible to leave questions beforehand), so it'd be nice if those interested listed their interests here.
Perhaps, working together, we'll come up with better questions that are more likely to be answered. There has been recent interest in regenerative systems, valve overlap, exhaust design, 2007 V8 idle RPM etc. The way I see it, here's our chance to get definite answers to some of these questions and a glimpse at the future. In addition to our recent topics, I would like to raise questions like these:
I'm hoping someone could formulate these better, or somehow make them more to the point or something. Let's see. I tend to be wordy (with no good reason) to the frustration of others. Anyway, here's some backround information on Axel Plasse, if you want to ask specifics on how he got where he is now (from http://engineeringf1.free.fr/en/index.html )1) Despite the 19.000 RPM limit, meaningful differences are said to remain in the bhp of 2007 F1 engines. Some of the commentators' approximations put BMW at the top currently. Would you agree and if so/ if not, where do you believe you're at in the bhp comparisons and how significant is peak output in terms of overall F1 engine performance and competitiviness?
2) An F1 engine produces far more power than can be used in a controlled fashion by the driver on most parts of most racetracks. Technological means such as TC moderate the excess power out of the equation. TC will be banned (and the ban controlled with the standard ECU) soon. What do you believe are the main modifications the team has to do to its engine so that it remains as driveable as possible?
3) As Renault has admittedly been a bit caught out with the transition to Bridgestones, aside from aero and suspension dynamics optimization, what can the engine dept. do to help the team get to grips with the tyres?
4) Denis Chevrier has recently expressed some frustration with the homologation and tight rules governing technology in general having a hindering effect in getting competitive through R&D. Would you agree, and have you perceived a similar attitude or opinion with other teams and engineers in F1 too?
Note - I have not, I repeat, not posted my questions to the Renault webchat "as is", since I truly hope this can be co-ordinated through F1T as far as the participants of this forum are concerned.AXEL PLASSE
Nationality : french
Date of birth : Septembre 7, 1968
Main fields of activity : engine
graduated from l’ENSICA (Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Ingénieurs de Construction Aéronautique) and from l'ENSPM (Ecole Nationale Supérieure du Pétrole et des Moteurs)
engineer > Sagem
1993-1996 : dyno test engineer, development, tuning > Renault (F1)
1996-1997 : track engineer for Williams > Renault (F1)
1998-1999 : head of F5R engine tests > Renault
1999-2003 : head of testing > Supertec/Renault (F1)
2003-2007 : project manager > Renault (F1)
EDIT: I reformulated my questions somewhat and updated them here, too. In the absence of any other questions to be co-ordinated, I took the time to file these "as is" with the Renault website. If either Tomba or Principessa are going to participate in the chat, my wish is that you'd go over the recent engine related topics with an eye for potential questions.
I hardly think each and every one of my four questions will be answered, so if I added even more, it'd surely only lessen the possibility that Plasse will answer an even larger amount. Better that they come from someone else. If I should get lucky and get an answer to any of my inquiries, I will post it here. À tout à l'heure!