By adding 1 to 665? Doesn't seem that far fetched.xpensive wrote:Wonder where they got that idea, number of the beast?
Source?Harsha wrote:F666 is now 3 points aerodynamically better than the F14T
And that despite the new need for more cooling because the more powerful engine
trinidefender wrote:Source?Harsha wrote:F666 is now 3 points aerodynamically better than the F14T
And that despite the new need for more cooling because the more powerful engine
http://www.telesport.hu/2014/10/28/megs ... s-ferrari/Omnicourse wrote:The Omnicorse but now writes for this news needless worry, the Italian engineers since the last time a major, three-point improvement in the aerodynamics field
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Faster than 0.1 sec over SauberThunders wrote:So does that mean they are now only 1,9 sec. slower than the F14T or actually 0.1 sec faster?
You aren't comparing to any other car right? I would like to presume that the benchmark for F14T is F14T itself. Otherwise, F14T stands naked in comparison to cars like W04, RB10 and FW36 which are obviously ahead of Ferrari. Which then means, compared to competition, their Aerodynamics are quite weak. If their aerodynamics were great; 1. They should have been lighting up the corners, but unfortunately, F14T has struggled to get through the corners and has displayed poor balance. 2. They should have had considerable margin over Sauber C33 in straight line speed, which isn't the case either as the margin quite small (Its Sauber). Then I wonder how is the F14T great aerodynamics wise?Pierce89 wrote:Its no surprise the windtunnel numbers are still behind the f14t. Aerodynamics is by far the f14t's strongest point. The aero is the only reason they've gotten any results from the weakest engine on the grid this year.
I agree with Pierce that the chassis & Aerodynamics of the F14T were its strong points. I believe Ferrari is finally on top of its Aero game, as unlike in previous years, all Aerodynamic updates this year were tried in free practice and used in Quali and the race. Something that hasn't happened in years.prince wrote:
You aren't comparing to any other car right? I would like to presume that the benchmark for F14T is F14T itself. Otherwise, F14T stands naked in comparison to cars like W04, RB10 and FW36 which are obviously ahead of Ferrari. Which then means, compared to competition, their Aerodynamics are quite weak. If their aerodynamics were great; 1. They should have been lighting up the corners, but unfortunately, F14T has struggled to get through the corners and has displayed poor balance. 2. They should have had considerable margin over Sauber C33 in straight line speed, which isn't the case either as the margin quite small (Its Sauber). Then I wonder how is the F14T great aerodynamics wise?
I wont go much ahead but if Ferrari got better in PU elements and its software can they come close to Williams or Redbull in a straight fight. As we also presume they can also get ahead with development on both sides (PU and Chassis)Crucial_Xtreme wrote: I agree with Pierce that the chassis & Aerodynamics of the F14T were its strong points. I believe Ferrari is finally on top of its Aero game, as unlike in previous years, all Aerodynamic updates this year were tried in free practice and used in Quali and the race. Something that hasn't happened in years.
I believe the poor balance of the car and at times its lack of traction is due to the poor Power Unit, the poor ERS, and poor mapping software. Hopefully progress is made on all three phases in 2015.