Not bad:
per year = £33,333,333
each week = £641,026
day = £91,575
Please elaborate, as I can't seem to see why not. Ferrari has already closed up a huge amount of lap time unfortunately...lebesset wrote:clever guy hamilton
I have thought for a long time what I would do in his position
instead of signing last year I would have played mercedes along until I was clear if there was better on the table
it's now clear that for the next 2 seasons there isn't going to be a better car , maybe not even going to be one as good
so time to sign on the dotted line
but whereas I am judging that with zero pressure he is at the sharp end , not so easy where he sits
While the following applies just as well to other top paid drivers, I want to put those figures into perspective: £94k is the maximum graded yearly salary UK universities pay. You really won't get more than that, no matter how many Nobel prices you win, or how much grant money you bring to your university. Hamilton's yearly salary would also be more than 1000x the average UK salary. It's just another planet.astracrazy wrote:Not bad:
per year = £33,333,333
each week = £641,026
day = £91,575
Let's be honest, the thrill is entering the battle and emerging as victor.Vasconia wrote:So this is the guy who said that was boring to win always with a clearly better car. Well, well...
I would have done the same but those comments sound quite rather hypocrite at that time, and now even more.
I don't see anything hypocritical at all. It's either 1.) be in a winning car and have the chance to win, or 2.) not be in a winning car and not have a chance to win. Doesn't mean it isn't more rewarding to win a championship or a race in a hard fought battle over taking a nap at the front with no real competitors and walking it comfortably - which last year clearly wasn't, despite the 'clearly better car'. Who knows, maybe he'll rap it up by september this year, but I think Rosberg is far from being beaten and might put up a fight along the way. Even if he does continue to win 3 out of 5 gps and wrap it up by September, if every race until then is a thriller with him emerging victor, it still would be very rewarding I could imagine.Vasconia wrote:So this is the guy who said that was boring to win always with a clearly better car. Well, well...
I would have done the same but those comments sound quite rather hypocrite at that time, and now even more.
well the quantum leap by ferrari has already been pinched off , mercedes have the resources to keep up with any development race , newey has drifted off , honda have started too far back and are unlikely to overtake mercedes in that period of time and McLaren haven't made a quantum leap chassis wiseDe Jokke wrote:Please elaborate, as I can't seem to see why not. Ferrari has already closed up a huge amount of lap time unfortunately...lebesset wrote:clever guy hamilton
I have thought for a long time what I would do in his position
instead of signing last year I would have played mercedes along until I was clear if there was better on the table
it's now clear that for the next 2 seasons there isn't going to be a better car , maybe not even going to be one as good
so time to sign on the dotted line
but whereas I am judging that with zero pressure he is at the sharp end , not so easy where he sits
I hope you are right but I really think that Ferrari will really challenge merc in 2016, if not, in 2017 certainly. So to suggest we'll win the next two seasons easily is a bit too far for me. And Honda will sort things out, they have already clawed back a lot of time (3.5 trimmed to 2 seconds now down on merc) and they still have to sort out their engine + bring token updates (merc as well but for merc the level playing field is smaller than for Honda). I hope that Hami can win this year and the next two after that but I look at it one race at a time.lebesset wrote:well the quantum leap by ferrari has already been pinched off , mercedes have the resources to keep up with any development race , newey has drifted off , honda have started too far back and are unlikely to overtake mercedes in that period of time and McLaren haven't made a quantum leap chassis wiseDe Jokke wrote:Please elaborate, as I can't seem to see why not. Ferrari has already closed up a huge amount of lap time unfortunately...lebesset wrote:clever guy hamilton
I have thought for a long time what I would do in his position
instead of signing last year I would have played mercedes along until I was clear if there was better on the table
it's now clear that for the next 2 seasons there isn't going to be a better car , maybe not even going to be one as good
so time to sign on the dotted line
but whereas I am judging that with zero pressure he is at the sharp end , not so easy where he sits
if you were hamilton , what conclusion would you have come to as to the percentage bet ? what number would you have put your money on when they spun the wheel ?