Its me or Ferrari has problems to make the US work? because the gap between the SS and US is quite small.bauc wrote:Kimi with ultra-softs a 1:22.765. That's the fastest time all winter till now
Well the US probably losses its optimal grip halfway trough this track, but in Monaco it will deliver much moreRhodium wrote:no bad, i'm suprised to see 1.22.765 with US and 1.23.009 on S.bauc wrote:Kimi with ultra-softs a 1:22.765. That's the fastest time all winter till now
only 0.300s ?
you're right.bauc wrote:Well the US probably losses its optimal grip halfway trough this track, but in Monaco it will deliver much moreRhodium wrote:no bad, i'm suprised to see 1.22.765 with US and 1.23.009 on S.bauc wrote:Kimi with ultra-softs a 1:22.765. That's the fastest time all winter till now
only 0.300s ?
[tweet]http://twitter.com/ScarbsF1/status/7053 ... 56/photo/1[/tweet]Vasconia wrote:I was not implying that should not use a protection system, I say that aesthetically is terrible and I dont know how it can affect driver´s vision. I clearly prefer Mercedes´s third option.Jolle wrote:
As for driver(s) who lost colleagues and friends due to being hit by debris, I think they would like to drive with this.
Cannot say anything, until we know amount of fuel... Nevertheless it is possitive.smhasan7 wrote:Raikkonen has posted a stunning time of 1.23.009 on Softs which is 2 steps harder than ultra softs and about half a tenth up on Rosberg's time. Have we underestimated Ferrari?
Update: Kimi also smashed the fastest time of testing so far with a 1.22.765 on Ultra softs... but the time on softs is really eye catching!