2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

justmoi wrote: Yes. As did Lewis on his last error strewn lap. I was looking forward to seeing a challenge for the lap record
I think he took to much out of them in sector 1 (20.154), because on his last lap he came back in sector 3 as well (29.054).
202 105 104 9 9 7

giantfan10
giantfan10
27
Joined: 27 Nov 2014, 18:05
Location: USA

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

ripper wrote:Disappointed by FER Q2, but let's wait... Anyway I don't expect a lot n Q3
Less than 2 tenths off mercedes pace and ahead of red bull that was supposed to conquer the world... go figure.... all that talk from ricciardo was just that talk... now maybe he will shutup for the rest of the weekend.....Vettel says he lost a bit of traction in the hairpin.....i guess that turbo upgrade does provide more power in qualifying.....here come the red bull fan excuses lmao

Sevach
Sevach
1088
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

Phil wrote:I think the Mercedes had more potential left on their second run. Nico ruined his lap in corner 1 and i am not sure of Hamilton then aborted his or took it a bit more easy... everyone else improved on their 2nd run despite the Mercs.

Then again, Canada is somewhat of a drivers circuit. Any street circuit is. A lot of time to be made by driving that closer to the limit or over...
Stop it, Hamilton just couldn't improve, Rosberg was behind him on track and the team wouldn't talk to him while he's on a flying lap.

User avatar
GPR-A duplicate2
64
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 09:00

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

Sevach wrote:
Phil wrote:I think the Mercedes had more potential left on their second run. Nico ruined his lap in corner 1 and i am not sure of Hamilton then aborted his or took it a bit more easy... everyone else improved on their 2nd run despite the Mercs.

Then again, Canada is somewhat of a drivers circuit. Any street circuit is. A lot of time to be made by driving that closer to the limit or over...
Stop it, Hamilton just couldn't improve, Rosberg was behind him on track and the team wouldn't talk to him while he's on a flying lap.
Lewis was up by 0.175 after first sector and then he was suddenly down by 0.3xx, which means he made a mistake somewhere in the second sector to lose more than 4 tenths.

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

GPR-A wrote: Lewis was up by 0.175 after first sector and then he was suddenly down by 0.3xx, which means he made a mistake somewhere in the second sector to lose more than 4 tenths.
Like I said, I think he over cooked them in sector 1, because he was purple in sector 1 and 3 and slow in 2.
202 105 104 9 9 7

Sevach
Sevach
1088
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

GPR-A wrote:
Sevach wrote:
Phil wrote:I think the Mercedes had more potential left on their second run. Nico ruined his lap in corner 1 and i am not sure of Hamilton then aborted his or took it a bit more easy... everyone else improved on their 2nd run despite the Mercs.

Then again, Canada is somewhat of a drivers circuit. Any street circuit is. A lot of time to be made by driving that closer to the limit or over...
Stop it, Hamilton just couldn't improve, Rosberg was behind him on track and the team wouldn't talk to him while he's on a flying lap.
Lewis was up by 0.175 after first sector and then he was suddenly down by 0.3xx, which means he made a mistake somewhere in the second sector to lose more than 4 tenths.
Hamilton's S1 0.033 better, after S2 he was 1 tenth or so down on his first lap so he lost 2 tenths in S2.

User avatar
lio007
320
Joined: 28 Jan 2013, 23:03
Location: Austria

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

Wow...RIC almost 3 sec faster than his 2015 Q3-laptime. Decent step I'd say.

GrayGreat
GrayGreat
-2
Joined: 25 Apr 2016, 07:21

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

GPR-A wrote:
Sevach wrote:
Phil wrote:I think the Mercedes had more potential left on their second run. Nico ruined his lap in corner 1 and i am not sure of Hamilton then aborted his or took it a bit more easy... everyone else improved on their 2nd run despite the Mercs.

Then again, Canada is somewhat of a drivers circuit. Any street circuit is. A lot of time to be made by driving that closer to the limit or over...
Stop it, Hamilton just couldn't improve, Rosberg was behind him on track and the team wouldn't talk to him while he's on a flying lap.
Lewis was up by 0.175 after first sector and then he was suddenly down by 0.3xx, which means he made a mistake somewhere in the second sector to lose more than 4 tenths.
Source for those numbers? Because I think they are wrong.

User avatar
Phil
66
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 16:22

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

Sevach wrote:
Phil wrote:I think the Mercedes had more potential left on their second run. Nico ruined his lap in corner 1 and i am not sure of Hamilton then aborted his or took it a bit more easy... everyone else improved on their 2nd run despite the Mercs.

Then again, Canada is somewhat of a drivers circuit. Any street circuit is. A lot of time to be made by driving that closer to the limit or over...
Stop it
No offense, i was just guessing, as the reply i was replying to was hinting of a more exciting 2nd half of the season, suggesting that Ferrari & Co. has closed the gap.

My post was merely to suggest that there must have been a reason why the gap was so small in the end and pointing out that all the cars improved on their 2nd lap while the Mercs didnt. A simple fact.
Not for nothing, Rosberg's Championship is the only thing that lends credibility to Hamilton's recent success. Otherwise, he'd just be the guy who's had the best car. — bhall II
#Team44 supporter

User avatar
iotar__
7
Joined: 28 Sep 2012, 12:31

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

Sevach wrote:
Phil wrote:I think the Mercedes had more potential left on their second run. Nico ruined his lap in corner 1 and i am not sure of Hamilton then aborted his or took it a bit more easy... everyone else improved on their 2nd run despite the Mercs.

Then again, Canada is somewhat of a drivers circuit. Any street circuit is. A lot of time to be made by driving that closer to the limit or over...
Stop it, Hamilton just couldn't improve, Rosberg was behind him on track and the team wouldn't talk to him while he's on a flying lap.
Thanks. 'took it easy' of course... So what if he was quicker in the first sector #-o, what kind of logic is that? Maybe it was pace with mistakes included later? As always pointless additions.
- Told you Ferrari would be quick.
- Bottas - Massa within 0,1. Why would they want to replace Massa with Button? A lot of tweets and followers?

User avatar
F1NAC
172
Joined: 31 Mar 2013, 22:35

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

Phil wrote:
Sevach wrote:
Phil wrote:I think the Mercedes had more potential left on their second run. Nico ruined his lap in corner 1 and i am not sure of Hamilton then aborted his or took it a bit more easy... everyone else improved on their 2nd run despite the Mercs.

Then again, Canada is somewhat of a drivers circuit. Any street circuit is. A lot of time to be made by driving that closer to the limit or over...
Stop it
No offense, i was just guessing, as the reply i was replying to was hinting of a more exciting 2nd half of the season, suggesting that Ferrari & Co. has closed the gap.

My post was merely to suggest that there must have been a reason why the gap was so small in the end and pointing out that all the cars improved on their 2nd lap while the Mercs didnt. A simple fact.
Well Merc improved massively from q1 into q2, Ferrari(Vettel) did that from q2 which was close to q1 into q3

giantfan10
giantfan10
27
Joined: 27 Nov 2014, 18:05
Location: USA

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

Phil wrote:
Sevach wrote:
Phil wrote:I think the Mercedes had more potential left on their second run. Nico ruined his lap in corner 1 and i am not sure of Hamilton then aborted his or took it a bit more easy... everyone else improved on their 2nd run despite the Mercs.

Then again, Canada is somewhat of a drivers circuit. Any street circuit is. A lot of time to be made by driving that closer to the limit or over...
Stop it
No offense, i was just guessing, as the reply i was replying to was hinting of a more exciting 2nd half of the season, suggesting that Ferrari & Co. has closed the gap.

My post was merely to suggest that there must have been a reason why the gap was so small in the end and pointing out that all the cars improved on their 2nd lap while the Mercs didnt. A simple fact.
The reason is Ferrari has made a step with their turbo upgrade... why is that not a possibilty?

User avatar
GPR-A duplicate2
64
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 09:00

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

GrayGreat wrote:
GPR-A wrote:
Sevach wrote:
Stop it, Hamilton just couldn't improve, Rosberg was behind him on track and the team wouldn't talk to him while he's on a flying lap.
Lewis was up by 0.175 after first sector and then he was suddenly down by 0.3xx, which means he made a mistake somewhere in the second sector to lose more than 4 tenths.
Source for those numbers? Because I think they are wrong.
It was what I saw on TV. I hope someone posts the numbers from F1 livetiming data.

justmoi
justmoi
1
Joined: 02 Mar 2016, 03:35

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

dans79 wrote:
GPR-A wrote: Lewis was up by 0.175 after first sector and then he was suddenly down by 0.3xx, which means he made a mistake somewhere in the second sector to lose more than 4 tenths.
Like I said, I think he over cooked them in sector 1, because he was purple in sector 1 and 3 and slow in 2.
Do you mean overcooked the tyres? Cause that doesn't make sense if he took too much out of the tyres in S1 for him to then be fastest in S3. Besides the US will last for more than a whole hot lap here in Canada as we've seen. And again, his S1 time on both runs were pretty much identical but it sure didn't affect his first run lap time where he did his best S2.

He just didn't do a good S2 on his final run. Definitely more time there
Last edited by justmoi on 11 Jun 2016, 20:34, edited 1 time in total.

Sevach
Sevach
1088
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2016 Canadian Grand Prix - Montreal, Fri 10 – Sun 12 Jun

Post

GPR-A wrote:
GrayGreat wrote:
GPR-A wrote:Lewis was up by 0.175 after first sector and then he was suddenly down by 0.3xx, which means he made a mistake somewhere in the second sector to lose more than 4 tenths.
Source for those numbers? Because I think they are wrong.
It was what I saw on TV. I hope someone posts the numbers from F1 livetiming data.
You need glasses...
Phil wrote: No offense, i was just guessing, as the reply i was replying to was hinting of a more exciting 2nd half of the season, suggesting that Ferrari & Co. has closed the gap.

My post was merely to suggest that there must have been a reason why the gap was so small in the end and pointing out that all the cars improved on their 2nd lap while the Mercs didnt. A simple fact.
You could just say it's a short lap :D