Ferrari's 80's Halted Indy Project "637"

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
Post Reply
Manoah2u
61
Joined: 24 Feb 2013, 14:07

Ferrari's 80's Halted Indy Project "637"

Post

Since Alonso's announcement has as ull riled up again for the American golden race that is the Indy500,
let's go back in time to a story that possibly unfortunately never happened, and possibly fortunately it indeed didn't.

Why?

Ferrari might have stepped out of F1 back in the mid-eighties. They were definately serious in what they were doing,
and one can only use their imagination to what the history of F1 would have been like if the legendary Italian Marque really stopped their F1 activities back then. Perhaps they would have returned a couple years later, perhaps not. Perhaps they would have completely turned Indy upside down and they would have had massive success in America, or maybe it would have flopped alltogether.

Back in 1985, there was an interesting situation going on. Indy 500 and Champ Car (CART) series were doing fantastic. The cars participating were running the highest top and average speeds in the world, and many big manufacturers were starting to join. Porsche, Lotus, Alfa Romeo, and offcourse Mclaren has been part of the series years before, too.

In F1, things didn't look so great though. Enzo Ferrari was constantly in argument with FISA, and their latest announcement that they'd tone down the insane powerhouses into N/A 3.5 L V8's - thus banning the V12 engine, was the last straw for the Maranello team.

Enzo didn't want to stop running their prize posession: The mighty Ferrari V12, But FISA – The predecessor to the FIA, then led by the unrelenting Jean-Marie Balestre, was having none of it.

But Enzo was having even less of that, so Enzo went ahead and showed just how big of a pair he had. And despite this story having been marked as 'bluffing', his own son denied that completely.

Pierro Ferrari : “He wasn’t bluffing,” “He was serious."

Image

After their public fallout with Balestre and FISA, Ferrari started something amazing : A Indy 500 competitor.

The project was called 'Ferrari 637' and after Marco Piccinini, Ferrari's Sporting Director back then investigated
and made some contacts in the sport and quickly aquired a March-Cosworth that they drove around Maranello
for a while and then started building their own.

The powerhouse - ironically - was a methanol-fueled 2.65 Litre 32-Valve V8 Turbo, which had it's exhaust system configured very innovatively inside the V instead of outside it and boasted 700+ HP figures.

Image

Offcourse Ferrari also fabricated their own chassis, which was equally interesting. Superbly sleek and low, developed by Gustav Brunner, whom stated he took inspiration from the Williams FW09's design and converted into an Indy-spec chassis.

The result was stunning :

Image
Image
Image

When the fully working prototype was completed, it was driven around the Fiorano track by Michele Alboreto, a signed Ferrari F1-driver back then, who liked it a lot and stated it surely would have been fast straight out of the box.

Enzo Ferrari was deadly serious about what they were doing. So serious even, that apart from the huge amounts of money spend on the project, that they had signed a three-year deal with TrueSports to race their Ferrari 637 in the Laguna Seca '86 Finale and participate the full 1987 season with Bobby Rahal behind the wheel, though also Andrea de Cesaris was concidered.

Still, there was uncertainty and most FISA members, also Balestre, were still not impressed and thought it was all a farce, a show, bluffing. In a final effort, which would shape F1 and Ferrari's future in F1 once and for all, whatever the outcome, there was a meeting between FISA and Ferrari.

Ferrari invited FISA and other parties to a meeting in Maranello to talk about F1's future. Aware of Ferrari's plans, even though not entirely convinced about the entire project, the representatives aimed to convince Ferrari to stay in F1. Enzo Ferrari stated he wanted to stay in F1 but if he has to ditch the V12 engine, he could 'not guarantee' he wouldn't persue other options.

To which - brilliantly orchestrated - the audience was stunned to hear a turbocharged V8 being ignited and roaring, to which Enzo quickly was to point the crowd to the actual existing Ferrari 637 Indy 500 competitor.

Suddenly, it hit home to the crowd and the FISA; Ferrari was not boasting, bluffing and bragging. They were about to pull out, leaving the sport in the cold, and leaving to have success in the states.
It didn't take long before Ferrari was allowed to keep running V12 engines, as long as they immediately would abandon their Indy project. The 637 was shelved and consigned to the deepest, darkest vaults of history at Maranello.

The rest is obviously history. Ferrari ran their V12's and aborted their Indy plans. It never happened.
It remains utter speculation on how the whole motorsports world would have looked like had Ferrari pulled out
and persued an Indy future. Would they have dominated the series? Would they have returened to F1? We will never know.

The 637 did finally make an appearance at Indianapolis, but it wasn’t in the Memorial Day classic. In January 1994, Ferrari sent the car the Brickyard where it was put on display in the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Hall of Fame with a plaque that made no secret of its purpose. It read, “Ferrari. Designed to race at Indianapolis 500 in 1987.”

Today, the 637 is on display in the Ferrari museum in Maranello, a stark reminder of when the Prancing Horse threatened to pull out of Formula One.

Image
Image
Image

Image
Image
Image

Image

Source(s):

http://blackflag.jalopnik.com/the-incon ... 1781964011
https://web.archive.org/web/20160307150 ... it-threat/

credits to:

Scuderia Ferrari, Raphael Orlove (Jalopnik), and Rob Margeit (AutoAction).

I have summarised the above from the sources mentioned here.
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"

AccipiterNL
4
Joined: 06 Aug 2013, 11:28

Re: Ferrari's 80's Halted Indy Project "637"

Post

Nice article with some very nice pics too but no offence intended when I ask you the following.

The picture with technical stats you added is made by me and used within two pieces I devoted to this car and can be found of the internet within the files of Forix-8W. I am the author of both these articles.

I know, using a single picture taken from the internet is not something to get livid about and I don't want to make too much of a fuzz about it. But I regret that you didn't make the efforts to at least list where you got the used pictures from .

BTW, I love the picture of the engine and transmission. Is that by chance yours? If so, can I ask your permission to reproduce that picture within my piece about the car? Thanks.

Again, I don't want to make a fuss, OK?



AccipiterNL=Henri Greuter

bill shoe
151
Joined: 19 Nov 2008, 08:18
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA

Re: Ferrari's 80's Halted Indy Project "637"

Post

It sounds like this car's first full season in CART would have been 1987. Problem is that the aero looks like Indycar circa 1985, not circa 1987. Probably would not have been competitive with the 1987 March and especially the 1987 Lola.

Most likely result would have been an experience like the Porsche that ran one year later at the end of 1987. This was a Porsche engine and chassis, just like Ferrari approach. That Porsche was a massive, total, overwhelming dog. And just like Ferrari, the 1987 Porsche car looked at least 2 or 3 years out of date aero-wise. Porsche withdrew the car and put their engine in a conventional (March?) chassis for 1988.

The Ferrari engine has the exhaust done the right way in the V, this allows a 90-deg crank for less vibration combined with optimal exhaust flow. If the rules hadn't banned it this would surely be how all Indycar V8 turbos would have ended up. Come to think of it, this is how the current F1 V6 turbos would be if the rules didn't ban it. Down side for Ferrari Indycar engine-- It probably had potential to be competitive against the Cosworth of the day, but not the Illmor V8 which debuted in 1986 and ran the full schedule in 1987.

It's a beautiful car but I have to conclude that a Ferrari transition from F1 to Indycar would have essentially killed the firm. Ferrari today would be like Lotus or Maserati: putting out a handful of cars or being sold-around as a branding exercise for real car companies.

This thought exercise makes me appreciate the current/real Ferrari even more.
'

Manoah2u
61
Joined: 24 Feb 2013, 14:07

Re: Ferrari's 80's Halted Indy Project "637"

Post

AccipiterNL wrote:
15 Apr 2017, 20:21
Nice article with some very nice pics too but no offence intended when I ask you the following.

The picture with technical stats you added is made by me and used within two pieces I devoted to this car and can be found of the internet within the files of Forix-8W. I am the author of both these articles.

I know, using a single picture taken from the internet is not something to get livid about and I don't want to make too much of a fuzz about it. But I regret that you didn't make the efforts to at least list where you got the used pictures from .

BTW, I love the picture of the engine and transmission. Is that by chance yours? If so, can I ask your permission to reproduce that picture within my piece about the car? Thanks.

Again, I don't want to make a fuss, OK?



AccipiterNL=Henri Greuter
i showed the links of the sources, including names.
"Explain the ending to F1 in football terms"
"Hamilton was beating Verstappen 7-0, then the ref decided F%$& rules, next goal wins
while also sending off 4 Hamilton players to make it more interesting"

Post Reply