diffuser wrote: ↑09 Aug 2019, 14:02
tomayto, tomahto
It all comes down to what "didn't see it" means. Was it there and they missed it or it wasn't there in the data? I would agree if it wasn't in the data then it was a corelation issue.
That we don't know, I think.
Exactly. I mean McLaren obviously didn't design their car with a fundamental flaw in mind. They modelled and simulated it, tested it in a wind tunnel and though everything was fine. Only on track they saw it wasn't, and for several months they could not figure out what it was. To me that is definition of a correlation issue.
It's possible their development on that car during the year was not affected by correlation (new wings, etc) but the basis of the car had a flaw, and that flaw surely was because something in their model/testing was wrong.