2022 Aerodynamic Regulations Thread

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
Steven
Owner
Joined: 19 Aug 2002, 18:32
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Impressive work base_1000 !

Anyway, I was wondering what is the effect of removing rear wing endplates (more specifically, the part that currently sits on the high pressure side of the rear wing?

Is that just a way to reduce some downforce, and the strength of that vortex at the wingtip, while trying to keep a similar ad-surface on the rear wing? Is it aerodynamically less impacting for the wake than just a long AoA rear wing like in the current regs?

Just_a_fan
591
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Beautiful images. =D>
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.


User avatar
MtthsMlw
1033
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

As a 4 flap FW is allowed I wonder if anyone will even go for a 3 flap one as shown on the red model.

User avatar
Blackout
1562
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Great insight insidef1 and turbo and Jjn etc.
They should have gone even further and standardised 80% of the "floor" and diffuser, atleast for 2021 in order to set everyone on an equal footing, at least at the start of the new regs...
What about the car length/wheelbase and weight? will they try to reduce them?

base_1000
40
Joined: 01 Nov 2019, 10:57

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Steven wrote:
01 Nov 2019, 11:46
Impressive work base_1000 !

Thank you!


Image

Here's the car untextured, the details and curves are more apparent. And here's the Behance project page if anyone is interested.

User avatar
Holm86
243
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Steven wrote:
01 Nov 2019, 11:46
Impressive work base_1000 !

Anyway, I was wondering what is the effect of removing rear wing endplates (more specifically, the part that currently sits on the high pressure side of the rear wing?

Is that just a way to reduce some downforce, and the strength of that vortex at the wingtip, while trying to keep a similar ad-surface on the rear wing? Is it aerodynamically less impacting for the wake than just a long AoA rear wing like in the current regs?
I also have a hard time making sense of that rear wing, it seems really inefficient.
There will no doubt be a lot of spill over on the sides, and that will probably make two quite strong vorticies.
I think I saw in the demo video that they actually push the wake down, maybe thats a way to push down the following car??

Just_a_fan
591
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Holm86 wrote:
01 Nov 2019, 12:49


I also have a hard time making sense of that rear wing, it seems really inefficient.
There will no doubt be a lot of spill over on the sides, and that will probably make two quite strong vorticies.
I think I saw in the demo video that they actually push the wake down, maybe thats a way to push down the following car??
Isn't the aim to generate a vortex that pulls in the wake and then lift it upwards and so clear of the following car?

As the diffuser is bigger etc., the rear wing doesn't need to be as efficient in order to get the overall downforce numbers.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

User avatar
Holm86
243
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:
01 Nov 2019, 13:12
Holm86 wrote:
01 Nov 2019, 12:49


I also have a hard time making sense of that rear wing, it seems really inefficient.
There will no doubt be a lot of spill over on the sides, and that will probably make two quite strong vorticies.
I think I saw in the demo video that they actually push the wake down, maybe thats a way to push down the following car??
Isn't the aim to generate a vortex that pulls in the wake and then lift it upwards and so clear of the following car?

As the diffuser is bigger etc., the rear wing doesn't need to be as efficient in order to get the overall downforce numbers.
Take a look at 1:32 minutes, you can clearly see two large vortecies pushing the wake down


NOTE: You may have to open the video seperately in youtube, as F1 doesn't let you implement the video #-o
Last edited by Holm86 on 01 Nov 2019, 13:59, edited 1 time in total.

Sevach
1043
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Edge of the floor slots still allowed.
Some flexibility in tunnel shape.
Sidepods and nose of course.

Cars will look good, let's see if they deliver on racing.
Hpefully DRS is less powerful.

User avatar
jjn9128
769
Joined: 02 May 2017, 23:53

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Blackout wrote:
01 Nov 2019, 11:59
Great insight insidef1 and turbo and Jjn etc.
They should have gone even further and standardised 80% of the "floor" and diffuser, atleast for 2021 in order to set everyone on an equal footing, at least at the start of the new regs...
What about the car length/wheelbase and weight? will they try to reduce them?
The floor is pretty standard.. there's a minimum and maximum shape for the tunnels (previous rules only even specified a maximum height for the diffuser) which doesn't leave a lot of room to play with. The diffuser endfence is also quite tight and there's not a lot of room to play with it. Then there's the minimum convex and concave radii. The vane surfaces are a little more open but still not huge freedom.
Image
#aerogandalf
"There is one big friend. It is downforce. And once you have this it’s a big mate and it’s helping a lot." Robert Kubica

User avatar
Holm86
243
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Does the regulations say anything about serrated front wing planes?? Or does it have to be a constant line on the leading and trailing edge?

User avatar
jjn9128
769
Joined: 02 May 2017, 23:53

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

How do you mean? Like this? Image

EDIT: I think not
g. The rearward most point of every closed section, when projected in Z on to the reference plane, must produce a single tangent continuous curve with no radius of curvature smaller than 200mm.
#aerogandalf
"There is one big friend. It is downforce. And once you have this it’s a big mate and it’s helping a lot." Robert Kubica

User avatar
Holm86
243
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

jjn9128 wrote:
01 Nov 2019, 14:04
How do you mean? Like this? http://cdn-8.motorsport.com/images/mgl/ ... detail.jpg
Exactly, if its legal, I can see some teams trying to generate vortices at the tips of serrations ...

User avatar
Holm86
243
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

jjn9128 wrote:
01 Nov 2019, 14:04


EDIT: I think not
g. The rearward most point of every closed section, when projected in Z on to the reference plane, must produce a single tangent continuous curve with no radius of curvature smaller than 200mm.
But how about the front edge??

Post Reply