Just_a_fan wrote: ↑05 Jul 2020, 17:17
Horner talking rubbish again "it's like he has something against him" when talking about the Hamilton/Albon incident. Horner really does play the broken winged bird to the full. It's sickening.
Albon very upset. I can understand that. Young driver seeing the possibility of a win. Don't agree with him saying "it's up to him if we crash". As he said - it's a risk to go around the outside.
Hamilton seems to be fairly even about it. Accepts the penalty from yesterday and from today.
The Scottish bloke says Albon deserved more space but also Hamilton couldn't do anything about it. It's a racing incident but the penalty is deserved because Albon lost out. Strange logic.
I don’t think the penalty was DESERVED because Albon lost so many positions, but I think it was APPLIED because Albon lost so many positions. Which as far as I’m concerned is absolutely the wrong way to go about it and probably why the stewards often find themselves in such a mess and copping so much stick.
The penalty should be decided by the impact incident alone and not the consequences of the impact. It happened earlier in the race with Vettel. There’s no doubt he was at fault when he spun earlier but no penalty because HE lost out. That shouldn’t matter. He would have been penalised if the car he hit spun. Just because it didn’t doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be.
If Albon doesn’t spin, then they don’t give Hamilton a penalty. That’s what’s wrong with the system in F1. It should be consistent to the cause of the incident, regardless of the effect.