That's what i thought ... there was easily enough space for a car if it wasn't for their little table
Who are you trying to kid?JordanMugen wrote: ↑06 Sep 2020, 19:32That is negative conjecture, unfairly targeting volunteer marshalls. Not a nice sentiment at all!
The space there was not large enough to fit a 5.3mx2m F1 car actually.
It was initially just yellow flags. Then when it became apparent that the car had to be wheeled through the pit lane it was safety car and closed pit lane.Moore77 wrote: ↑06 Sep 2020, 19:30I am not asking the obvious. The car had just stranded and it wasn't an accident zone like turn 1. Was there a need to immediately close the pit lane and push the car in?LM10 wrote: ↑06 Sep 2020, 19:25Because the marshals pushed the car through pit entry.Moore77 wrote: ↑06 Sep 2020, 19:23Anyone know why they closed pit entry? The stranded car was quite far behind. When the leader was so far ahead of the pack and so close to pit entry, displaying pit close signal didn't make sense. They should have brought SC earlier than that or allowed leader to pass the start line before flagging SC and closing pit lane. There was no accident and no one the track, so they should have used a bit of brain. They robbed a deserving winner by catching him off guard.
Surely Merc will question that and rightly so!
I have no problem with that, but why wasn't the light at the beginning of pit Lane on.
This is the same outfit that relays on old tech like movement sensors when It’s clear on modern HD cameras a car has gone before the lights.dans79 wrote: ↑06 Sep 2020, 19:38I have no problem with that, but why wasn't the light at the beginning of pit Lane on.
It's ridiculous considering the amount of money involved in F1 that it seems like we're still stuck in the late 60s with people manually flipping switches on the lights after being told to do so on a radio.
Everything with the FIA is a committee via a game of telephone.
Agree with that. As I pointed out earlier, mr Kravitz said the TEAMS don’t even get explicitly notified by race control that the pit lane is shut. I’d have thought it would warrant a direct message to the pit wall as a whole.
It's comical and is a fix IMO.El Scorchio wrote: ↑06 Sep 2020, 19:49Agree with that. As I pointed out earlier, mr Kravitz said the TEAMS don’t even get explicitly notified by race control that the pit lane is shut. I’d have thought it would warrant a direct message to the pit wall as a whole.
I don’t know about it being a fix, but it’s a poor procedure. Granted it’s rare to have to close the pit lane in a race, but you would think it’s a big enough event to be worth more of a warning to the teams than something appearing on the bottom of a timing screen. I suppose you’d argue the teams should be alert to all eventualities and only two teams fell foul, but they should consider a change. They did break a rule, and to be fair, took it on the chin in the end.Wass85 wrote: ↑06 Sep 2020, 19:51It's comical and is a fix IMO.El Scorchio wrote: ↑06 Sep 2020, 19:49Agree with that. As I pointed out earlier, mr Kravitz said the TEAMS don’t even get explicitly notified by race control that the pit lane is shut. I’d have thought it would warrant a direct message to the pit wall as a whole.
Other examples are when drivers make a questionable pass and the driver and team are unsure whether to let the driver back past.
Why can't race control just order an action instead of not saying anything and then giving them a penalty?