SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Breaking news, useful data or technical highlights or vehicles that are not meant to race. You can post commercial vehicle news or developments here.
Please post topics on racing variants in "other racing categories".
Greg Locock
233
Joined: 30 Jun 2012, 00:48

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

I was comparing the claimed top speed for this one-off, to the world record for the fastest piston engined, wheel driven, one-off car. Seems to me that's the only logical comparison if you are going for bragging rights.

https://www.racecar-engineering.com/new ... .183%20mph.

User avatar
P.S.
5
Joined: 23 Oct 2011, 17:09
Location: Germany

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

Well, that's kind of a nice coincidence. So the speed difference Julian Thomas (Racelogic) calculated for the Tuatara "record-run" is 107 mph. And that's basically the difference between the claimed 331 mph and the 437 mph of the Speed Demon. :mrgreen:

That almost gives room for speculation... :lol: . Maybe SSC has a plan. At least they have some attention for a second attempt.

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

I still don't understand and haven't seen a reason given, as to why SSC claimed a Dewetron representative was present to verify the run and that they had also officially corroborated those runs?

graham.reeds
16
Joined: 30 Jul 2015, 09:16

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

No. They verified the setup but no representative was present and did not verify the run. Deweton stated this to Engineering Explained.

User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

Hi guys I'm Shmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee... :mrgreen:
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

graham.reeds wrote:
07 Nov 2020, 22:50
No. They verified the setup but no representative was present and did not verify the run. Deweton stated this to Engineering Explained.
But SSC falsely claimed they did?

graham.reeds
16
Joined: 30 Jul 2015, 09:16

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

OO7 wrote:
08 Nov 2020, 01:40
graham.reeds wrote:
07 Nov 2020, 22:50
No. They verified the setup but no representative was present and did not verify the run. Deweton stated this to Engineering Explained.
But SSC falsely claimed they did?
Stretched the truth. All in all it is very fishy.

User avatar
Phil
66
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 16:22
Contact:

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

What i find astonishing is that they obviously ran a car with different (shorter) gearing and the GPS’s offset corraborated the reading of exactly the gearing of the vmax version. As if they matched/configured the gps to match exactly what they were expecting based on their gearing.

But in a run like this, isnt the point to have multiple sources to cross check and thus the validy of the runs...

I can understand that mistakes happen - but these are two mistakes that match perfectly: wrong gearing and wrong GPS that match the expected VMax perfectly. That seems a bit far fetched IMHO.
Not for nothing, Rosberg's Championship is the only thing that lends credibility to Hamilton's recent success. Otherwise, he'd just be the guy who's had the best car. — bhall II
#Team44 supporter

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

Phil wrote:
08 Nov 2020, 13:16
What i find astonishing is that they obviously ran a car with different (shorter) gearing and the GPS’s offset corraborated the reading of exactly the gearing of the vmax version. As if they matched/configured the gps to match exactly what they were expecting based on their gearing.

But in a run like this, isnt the point to have multiple sources to cross check and thus the validy of the runs...

I can understand that mistakes happen - but these are two mistakes that match perfectly: wrong gearing and wrong GPS that match the expected VMax perfectly. That seems a bit far fetched IMHO.
As you say, one would expect a watcher with at least a 'radar gun' type instrument (with a camera) at the point they expected max speed. For very little cost compared to the over all.
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

User avatar
nzjrs
60
Joined: 07 Jan 2015, 11:21
Location: Redacted

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

Phil wrote:
08 Nov 2020, 13:16
What i find astonishing is that they obviously ran a car with different (shorter) gearing and the GPS’s offset corraborated the reading of exactly the gearing of the vmax version. As if they matched/configured the gps to match exactly what they were expecting based on their gearing.
Exactly - I wonder why the engineering explained video didn't make this 'coincidence' even more clear or explicit. What are the chances the 'correction factor' nearly matched the ratio difference between the gear sets.

The most charitable interpretation is they turned up to the test with the wrong gear set, thought 'oh ---' and then thought they would fake it with the GPS correction factor - all the while thinking to themselves 'we will pack the correct gear set next time'

User avatar
P.S.
5
Joined: 23 Oct 2011, 17:09
Location: Germany

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

Hmm. Maybe I got it wrong, but I don´t get it. If the actual speed was 223 mph, it means the offset was 1.48. (At least I trust J.T. analyses the most)

The estimated actuall gearing ratio was : 3.454 and 0.784 but they claimed 2.92 and 0.757...
That offset would be 1.23. And this would get a speed of about 270 mph. Even the faster reversed engineered speeds are lower than that??

Cheers

User avatar
variante
131
Joined: 09 Apr 2012, 11:36
Location: Monza

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

P.S. wrote:
09 Nov 2020, 02:11
Hmm. Maybe I got it wrong, but I don´t get it. If the actual speed was 223 mph, it means the offset was 1.48. (At least I trust J.T. analyses the most)

The estimated actuall gearing ratio was : 3.454 and 0.784 but they claimed 2.92 and 0.757...
That offset would be 1.23. And this would get a speed of about 270 mph. Even the faster reversed engineered speeds are lower than that??

Cheers
Different RPM is the answer.
SSC claimed to have reached that 331mph record speed near the rev limiter (8800rpm), but from the video you can see that the rev counter wasn't doing more than 7500rpm, which translates into 233mph in 6th gear (using the 3.454 0.784 gearbox). Quite close to that 223mph.

At this point, it is clear that the SSC guy either is utterly incompetent or lied about nearly everything.
What a shame.

User avatar
P.S.
5
Joined: 23 Oct 2011, 17:09
Location: Germany

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

variante wrote:
09 Nov 2020, 08:54
Different RPM is the answer.
Ahhh. Thanks! But that also means the "most charitable interpretation" from nzjrs seems not sufficient as they clamed 331 insteat of 270. Though it would have been a nice interpretation indeed.

Hope they are somehow able to fix the situation. That Tuatara exterior deserves it imho.

User avatar
nzjrs
60
Joined: 07 Jan 2015, 11:21
Location: Redacted

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

P.S. wrote:
09 Nov 2020, 11:20
variante wrote:
09 Nov 2020, 08:54
Different RPM is the answer.
Ahhh. Thanks! But that also means the "most charitable interpretation" from nzjrs seems not sufficient as they clamed 331 insteat of 270. Though it would have been a nice interpretation indeed.

Hope they are somehow able to fix the situation. That Tuatara exterior deserves it imho.
You are correct (except for the exterior look, lol :sick:).

I took EE's 1.36 correction factor as 'close enough' to the ratio difference with the RPM also accounted for. But like you I now also think the 1.46/1.48 factor is more accurate - so I agree that is probably is too far away. Just a coincidence I guess. My bad!

User avatar
P.S.
5
Joined: 23 Oct 2011, 17:09
Location: Germany

Re: SSC Tuatara hits 331mph top speed!

Post

nzjrs wrote:
09 Nov 2020, 12:25
You are correct (except for the exterior look, lol :sick:).
exterior... :mrgreen: :mrgreen: Maybe another colour?
nzjrs wrote:
09 Nov 2020, 12:25
I took EE's 1.36 correction factor as 'close enough' to the ratio difference with the RPM also accounted for. But like you I now also think the 1.46/1.48 factor is more accurate - so I agree that is probably is too far away. Just a coincidence I guess. My bad!
But it is also not satisfying that the factor of 1.46~1.48 should be completely random... any other ideas??