We also like to be impressed though. Can you provide us the laptimes?Rikhart wrote:Ok now the brawngp has impressed me, barrichelo completed a race simulation (65 laps) with amazing speed throughout...
We also like to be impressed though. Can you provide us the laptimes?Rikhart wrote:Ok now the brawngp has impressed me, barrichelo completed a race simulation (65 laps) with amazing speed throughout...
The inconsistency is because he had to move over several times for all the blue flags.jddh1 wrote:Hammi did a 4 lap stint:
1:26.360, 1:25.236, 1:28.531, 1:23.998.
I know, I know, perhaps a bad setting. But the interesting bit is the inconsistency.
there was a red flag due to blown engine, could be oil on the track.jddh1 wrote:Hammi did a 4 lap stint:
1:26.360, 1:25.236, 1:28.531, 1:23.998.
I know, I know, perhaps a bad setting. But the interesting bit is the inconsistency.
Try the wikipedia site, they should have diagrams etc that do a better job than any forum post of mine could do.bonjon1979 wrote:Okay, another question from the less technical minded...gurney flaps? what are they? (Apart from a rather mean nickname we gave to a girl at my school)
Oh, they definitely have serious performance issues, but they do have next week as well to work on them. Over the last four days the whole field have closed up but these are only testing times so who knows!Roger the knife wrote:well, progress for McL, but if they don't end up with a high 19 or a very low 20, I now beleive that they have a serious performance issue
It was on a two fast lap stint, so I assume it was a quali run.mattclinch wrote:Barrichello with a 1:19.266 to top the times at the moment.