hehe, noRaptor22 wrote:but he's french
Prost means cheers
as in drinking beer or something
not the french driver
wie bitte = pardon (I think)
and that interview was before Bahrain was cancelled
hehe, noRaptor22 wrote:but he's french
Lengthening the wheelbase would be a major change but not beyond the realms of possibility at all. Its been done in the past and it canbe done again.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:
@marcush and Raptor.
It is also not beyond the realms of reason for Mercedes to increase the wheel base either. As a poster mentioned, short wheel base will exaggerate any characteristics.
Maybe this is the point. Find out what they do at the limit and work around it.
As for the sidepods, well that could be anything. We may see somthing less extravegent but more workable than Mclarens. We may not see anything new.
I think the key to the W02 lies in the Front tyres usage and the three plane front wing. Turn in hampered the W01 and it appears to be in the W02. Solve the turn in issue and Mercedes will be top 3.
Med4224 wrote:hehe, noRaptor22 wrote:but he's french
Prost means cheers
as in drinking beer or something
not the french driver
wie bitte = pardon (I think)
and that interview was before Bahrain was cancelled
Its a very gebneral statement to make that shorter wheelbase = less turning lock since there are other variables in that equation. As with all things in F1 the answer begins with "It depends..."raymondu999 wrote:Oh yeah. German beers and pork knuckles are awesome.![]()
But I digress.
Back to this W02 business. Would the angle of the steering lock (being less, due to the shorter wheelbases) help to have a positive effect on tyre preservation? I don' think it would affect degradation on the rear tyres in any way though. But I could be talking absolute bollocks
Thanks mtec80,mtec80 wrote:here is a brandnew article from the German Auto Motor uns Sport (again translated with Google):
Mercedes with the best top speed
Mercedes has made a step forward. Nice, but not enough, says sports chief Norbert Haug. The positive findings of the third test week, in his view, the car is now reliable and the leader in terms of top speed.
Norbert Haug looks after the test in Barcelona a bit more confident in the world than before. The Mercedes W02 GP has increased. By how much that nobody can say. The filing of the lap times is an equation with too many unknowns. Still dares to say Haug: "The thing we have shown in Barcelona, looked ever better than what we have seen in testing it." Both the best time of Nico Rosberg on the third day of testing as well as a continuous run of Michael Schumacher on the last day.
Rosberg had his two fastest laps on Sunday, with different tires. Once soft, even super soft. Michael Schumacher on Monday presented a long run of 16 laps with impressive consistency on the web: between warm-up lap and the lap back to the pits were the lap times as follows: 1:27.6 - 1:27.8 - 1:28.2 - 1:28.0 - 1: 28.8 - 1:29.7 - 1:28.7 - 1:28.9 - 1:29.4 - 1:29.3 -1:29.6 - 1:30.3 - 1:30.8 - 1:31.3 minutes. The slump in the sixth round explained by the fact that Schumacher had to overtake a car.
Mercedes has not yet so often cited large stage on the car, but a new front wing, vehicle votes and a better understanding of the tires were effective. 427 laps or 1988 miles in four days are proof that the worst problems are resolved. "Because we drive more could we now understand the car and the tires better. And that brings lap time," said Haug. "With our laps, we went very different settings than before." Moreover, Rosberg and Schumacher were still of various handicaps be slowed down. At times, went on strike KERS, the lower floor cleared, and at higher temperatures had cut holes in the paneling. summarum Summa remain as 6:00 to 8:00 Zehntel per lap on the track.
Top speed as a trump card
Now everything is on the last big shot from the Technical Bureau. "We exhaust our solution and have blown diffuser in the rear," said Haug and says cautiously optimistic: "If everything goes in the right direction, the Silver Arrow may surprise you." Another positive aspect: the Mercedes were 316 km / h faster on the straights. Only the Renault came into this area. This could be important when it comes to the overtaking. Haug predicts especially in the initial phase of a Grand Prix surprises, depending on how the drivers deal with their tires. "If the front is in combat, driving might destroy the tires. There is a shake up from further back with the harder tire compound or with careful used tires the whole field. As all the cars appeared together again are relatively close, could be the top speed an important role . play "
adam2007 wrote:this pisses me off why test a car with parts not going to use on the race? brawn said new upgrade for first race we heard this last year to so dont get your hopes up, just amazes me why just dont run all their new upgrades in the tests instead of old ones who cares if other people see them at end of day u can refine and play around once puts new 1 on they wont have any data for it and before you guys say simulator thats not very accurate as loads of diffent factors affects the car you cant get them in a simulator only on a race track like bumps in the road all that --- and many more. urghhhh they are so slow at the min!
gary Anderson like Eddie Jordan I prefer to ignore. Not being arrogant but Anderson now being a media consultant is under pressure to say something and has no real accountability.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Its amazing how Gary Anderson is basing his findings on the W02 from Valencia and Jerez. Barcelona has demonstrated that with almost no updates to the car Mercedes have shown decent consistency and times on longer runs.
Why have the press chosen to ignore this?
I think the story of a slow Mercedes shifts papers and ups readership.