Indeed so. Deliberately driving in to a competitor to take them out of the title, not once but twice. Deliberately "not spinning" at Monaco to prevent his rival getting pole. These are massive down marks in the greatness assessment.
Soooo, Schumacher had no real opposition in his team mates, beat them all and is great. Hamilton has had real opposition in his team mates, beat them overall if not outright, and he's not great.GPR -A wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 17:37That's your way of thinking by assuming that the whole world is going to think like you. Lewis beat the team mates that he got and also got beaten and to say, that is why he is better and Schumacher's greatness is any lesser because he didn't have that kind of team mates, is outright amateurish. The fact remains that, Lewis couldn't comprehensively beat his champion team mates in every single season and got beaten. If he would have beaten them every single year and on every single aspect, he would have stood much taller. But the fact is, he didn't.
You reached the conclusion that you WANTED! It was you who started berating Schumacher in the first place, where this whole argument started. I never said Lewis is NOT GREAT or his GREATNESS IS ANY LESSER than that of Michael's. That is what happens when you get so engrossed in your own web of confusions.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 20:00Soooo, Schumacher had no real opposition in his team mates, beat them all and is great. Hamilton has had real opposition in his team mates, beat them overall if not outright, and he's not great.GPR -A wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 17:37That's your way of thinking by assuming that the whole world is going to think like you. Lewis beat the team mates that he got and also got beaten and to say, that is why he is better and Schumacher's greatness is any lesser because he didn't have that kind of team mates, is outright amateurish. The fact remains that, Lewis couldn't comprehensively beat his champion team mates in every single season and got beaten. If he would have beaten them every single year and on every single aspect, he would have stood much taller. But the fact is, he didn't.
"Beating up sparring partners makes a great boxer, beating Tyson, Leonard and Frazier doesn't."
Riiiight...
And you have done the exact same thing!
Did you understand the point for which I said that? I hope not. He thought, I said, Lewis IS NOT GREAT, which I never did and he concluded THAT on his own. That is what I am talking about. It's important to follow the discussion when it is between two other people and not cherry pick.
Everyone can have their own opinion and everyone has the right to judge any driver's greatness based on their own terms. We need not have to agree with each other's barometer with which we assess the greatness. But berating one driver's greatness to hype up another, is downright absurd and childish to say the least. Is Hamilton a legend, YES HE IS. Is Michael a legend, YES HE IS. Is one greater than the other, rubbish. That, is my conclusion and you and everyone else can have their own too. Free society. But when someone writes nonsense about one driver who is admired by many on open public forums, just because he hates him, it would be contended.Soooo, Schumacher had no real opposition in his team mates, beat them all and is great. Hamilton has had real opposition in his team mates, beat them overall if not outright, and he's not great.
Come on man, Hamilton beat Alonso. If Kimi was DQ'd at the end of the season, who would have been champion?GPR -A wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 15:50Was level on points with Alonso, got beaten by Jenson in 2011 and also got beaten by Nico in 2016. Doesn't look very impressive. Does it? Even stevens at best. Wouldn't Michael have managed that? Might have bettered it.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 15:20Hamilton has driven against and beaten 3 world champions so far...
No, you completely missed my point. You reached the conclusion that you wanted to reach, which was that he was degrading Schumacher to boost Hamilton. Hence your response above.
You never made a point, you just barged into a conversation and representing another person's view that's all. You should go back and check how it all started to get an idea.