Is anybody aware of the track-side observations of the cars?
I am concerned about whether Lotus is going to be a problem for Mercedes.
Like I just said, Massa's 16th lap is FASTER than his first, so...Mr.S wrote: Oh please I am a Mercedes fan myself. BTW it is unimaginably stupid to say that they were trying to degrade their tyres.
They were checking TYRE degradation over various fuel-loads,setups & checking out which causes better times overall -> To push in the 1st Lap or Not. They are changing setups & fuel loads & getting Data. They are not TRYING to degrade their tyres. YOU DONT FIND A SWEET SPOT BY TRYING TO DEGRADE TYRES.
Nobody is TESTING TYRE DEGRADATION like that & nobody tests like that. On a normal sting you get DATA which helps you to understand it.
It does not matter what Webber was testing. This is UNHEARD of. I have never seen this last year. No team has even MANAGED to do a 16 lap run with loosing only 1s. This is EXTRA-ORDINARY. ABSOLUTELY OUT OF THIS WORLD.
Mr.S wrote:1.27.537 & 1.29.961.dren wrote:Nico's times above seemed to level off. His last and first time were within half a second.Mr.S wrote:Okay Nico's last run was a 12 Lap Run.He lost 2.4s.
Massa has lost 2.1 over a 10 lap Run. Times are fairly similar. Nico is probably slightly lighter.
But none of them are anywhere near Webber's 16 lap which is loosing 1s.
That is 2.4 odd seconds not half a second Dren.
This is GROSS violation. You guys are picking & choosing times to suit people.
Nico's 1st Lap which was 1.27.537 was omitted & the stint was shown from 1-30's... Ridiculous really. I am Mercedes fan but what is there to manipulate date to suit us??
chill ... get rid of the cafeine maybe ?Mr.S wrote:
snip
Alonso made the 20% comment after the first test in Jerez.kooleracer wrote:Gerhard Berger wrote:Ferrari are testing the new floor and diffuser from Byrne.kooleracer wrote:Ferrari is not having a good day at the office. A lot of instalation laps and the only covererd 60 odd laps today. Also Mclaren en Lotus are having issues. So of the topteams only Mercedes and Red Bull are stable. Ferrari en McLaren still having issues on the last test week. This is all playing in the hands of Red Bull again. Ferrari is still making wholesale changes on the last test days. They losing an awful lot of track time because of that. Quite because Alonso think they only understand 20% of the car.
72 1:27.993 -3.329
73 1:28.101 +0.108
74 1:28.259 +0.158
75 1:28.461 +0.202
76 1:28.333 -0.128
77 1:28.305 -0.028
78 1:28.277 -0.028
79 1:28.309 +0.032
80 1:28.299 -0.01
81 1:28.352 +0.053
82 1:28.583 +0.231
83 1:31.451 +2.868
84 1:28.496 -2.955
85 1:28.861 +0.365
86 1:28.919 +0.058
87 1:29.041 +0.122
This is quite troubling for the rest of the field.
Thats is just wrong. Alonso feels that they only understand 20% of the car, why are you changing components. This is really not a good sign, if take that route you will end up like ducati in MotoGP. A floor is a fundamentale component on the car. Look at Red Bull there are just focusing on car setup, thats what you are supposed to do in the last test session. They cannot have a base setup if there changing thinks on a daily base.
I think it will be:
Red Bull: Really sollid.
Mercedes/McLaren: Think they are really close.
Ferrari: A lot to sort out and a lot of catching up to do.
Yes, correct. Mercedes doesn't look too bad.Ferraripilot wrote:The average lap time is the metric that counts over a stint. Remember that
outstanding felipe, Smedley:'You are faster then Alonso' !banibhusan wrote:So Massa did 12 laps while losing just .9 sec (lap 83-94). Will someone bother to say it's out of the world and outstanding and all that?
Wait...hold up...stop the testing, everyone should give the championship to Ferrari and concentrate on 2013 now.banibhusan wrote:So Massa did 12 laps while losing just .9 sec (lap 83-94). Will someone bother to say it's out of the world and outstanding and all that?
Well it was Very Solid. But the opening lap was quite slow. So the real time was actually 1.2-1.3s+ atleast.banibhusan wrote:So Massa did 12 laps while losing just .9 sec (lap 83-94). Will someone bother to say it's out of the world and outstanding and all that?