2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
DenBommer
DenBommer
1
Joined: 09 May 2023, 14:20

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Ok, thanks for clarifying this

wuzak
wuzak
467
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Zynerji wrote:
09 May 2023, 18:13
If F1 is stuck with combustion, the most efficient would be a gas turbine generator with electric drive motors, imho.

My concept was to simplify and minimize that machine to the limit.
Small turbines tend to not be that efficient.

Roughly they are talking about 48% thermal efficiency for 2026 ICE (3000MJ/hr, target 400kW).

Small turbine efficiencies are much less than that.

wuzak
wuzak
467
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Zynerji wrote:
09 May 2023, 22:18
DenBommer wrote:
09 May 2023, 19:54
Maybe a stupid question, but if I'm correct is the RDE+turbo+MGUK a turbo generators on itself?
My idea was to put the rde between the impeller shell and the exducer shell (where the current turbo designs use a cartridge bearing), with the MGUH connected to the shaft on the impeller end. Something like 600V/300A because of high RPM that would drive electric motors front and rear. In this setup, there would be no battery (maybe small ultracap array for electric hysteresis). As driver demands torque, RPM of the gas generator changes to deliver more amperage. Pretty simple imho.
The best way to use the turbine in that case is to run it at constant speed (thereby maximising efficiency) and have the electric motor controller respond to the driver's input.

The turbine would not provide the peak output of the system, but a lower power figure, with a battery, or some kind of storage, providing the extra power when demanded, and storing the excess when the turbine is providing more than required.

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
10 May 2023, 16:38
Zynerji wrote:
09 May 2023, 22:18
DenBommer wrote:
09 May 2023, 19:54
Maybe a stupid question, but if I'm correct is the RDE+turbo+MGUK a turbo generators on itself?
My idea was to put the rde between the impeller shell and the exducer shell (where the current turbo designs use a cartridge bearing), with the MGUH connected to the shaft on the impeller end. Something like 600V/300A because of high RPM that would drive electric motors front and rear. In this setup, there would be no battery (maybe small ultracap array for electric hysteresis). As driver demands torque, RPM of the gas generator changes to deliver more amperage. Pretty simple imho.
The best way to use the turbine in that case is to run it at constant speed (thereby maximising efficiency) and have the electric motor controller respond to the driver's input.

The turbine would not provide the peak output of the system, but a lower power figure, with a battery, or some kind of storage, providing the extra power when demanded, and storing the excess when the turbine is providing more than required.
That's what I meant by a hysteresis battery.

User avatar
vorticism
323
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
15 May 2023, 05:14
RB-Ford latest update: https://racingnews365.com/exclusive-hor ... owertrains
Horner wrote: "Initially it was going to be a four-cylinder engine and a very different architecture, so it would have been a clean sheet for everybody. Whereas, basically, what we've ended up with is a current engine without the H [MGU-H] and a bigger battery.

"So that gives the incumbents a significant carryover advantage, which we are obviously pedalling hard to catch up."
First I've heard that the teams or FIA were considering a four cylinder for 2025/6.
𓄀

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

vorticism wrote:
17 May 2023, 19:11
AR3-GP wrote:
15 May 2023, 05:14
RB-Ford latest update: https://racingnews365.com/exclusive-hor ... owertrains
Horner wrote: "Initially it was going to be a four-cylinder engine and a very different architecture, so it would have been a clean sheet for everybody. Whereas, basically, what we've ended up with is a current engine without the H [MGU-H] and a bigger battery.

"So that gives the incumbents a significant carryover advantage, which we are obviously pedalling hard to catch up."
First I've heard that the teams or FIA were considering a four cylinder for 2025/6.
The irony is that Porsche was competing in the WEC from 2014-2018 with a turbocharged V4....

The discussions were happening at a time when F1 was trying to get Porsche to join....and claimed to reset so that no one had a carry over advantage...despite Porsche having years of experience with a V4, MGU-H and MGU-K :lol:
A lion must kill its prey.

User avatar
vorticism
323
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Honestly, Porsche's approach to motorsport seems the most intelligent sometimes.
𓄀

wuzak
wuzak
467
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

How much impact on the PU design will the chassis regulations have?

The 2026 regulations state:

5.20.3 All mechanical power to and from the MGU-K must pass through a single shaft to the MGU-K transmission. The connection to the ICE crankshaft must be ahead of XPU=100.

The MGUK could be tucked up under one bank of the engine, or it could be positioned ahead of the engine.

With the new regulations possibly reducing car dimensions, the wheelbase could be cut by as much as 600mm, maybe more.

This would shift the weight balance rearwards, which would require narrower front tyres, relative to the rear, than now, or the teams would have to find ways to shift the weight forward, such as moving the MGUK ahead of the ICE (MGUK is ~8.7% of PU total mass).

Bill
Bill
8
Joined: 28 Apr 2018, 10:28

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
17 May 2023, 19:16
vorticism wrote:
17 May 2023, 19:11
AR3-GP wrote:
15 May 2023, 05:14
RB-Ford latest update: https://racingnews365.com/exclusive-hor ... owertrains
First I've heard that the teams or FIA were considering a four cylinder for 2025/6.
The irony is that Porsche was competing in the WEC from 2014-2018 with a turbocharged V4....

The discussions were happening at a time when F1 was trying to get Porsche to join....and claimed to reset so that no one had a carry over advantage...despite Porsche having years of experience with a V4, MGU-H and MGU-K :lol:
IS not an mguh is just an electrical machine that produce electricity using gases from exhaust pipes.mguh is much much more than that and more complex and expensive.

mzso
mzso
65
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Zynerji wrote:
10 May 2023, 22:02
wuzak wrote:
10 May 2023, 16:38
Zynerji wrote:
09 May 2023, 22:18


My idea was to put the rde between the impeller shell and the exducer shell (where the current turbo designs use a cartridge bearing), with the MGUH connected to the shaft on the impeller end. Something like 600V/300A because of high RPM that would drive electric motors front and rear. In this setup, there would be no battery (maybe small ultracap array for electric hysteresis). As driver demands torque, RPM of the gas generator changes to deliver more amperage. Pretty simple imho.
The best way to use the turbine in that case is to run it at constant speed (thereby maximising efficiency) and have the electric motor controller respond to the driver's input.

The turbine would not provide the peak output of the system, but a lower power figure, with a battery, or some kind of storage, providing the extra power when demanded, and storing the excess when the turbine is providing more than required.
That's what I meant by a hysteresis battery.
Well, it wasn't clear at all. :)

But I still fail to see how it could be efficient, if we assume it could work at all (a very big if).
You have the RDE to generate thrust with its efficiency being less than the carnot limit, which you don't use for propulsion at all. Then you have a detonations, extreme supersonic airflow spikes that somehow drives a turbine for which the carnot limit applies a second time. And then the generator. And you have some fancy transmission that connects the turbine spinning at 50k-100k RPM with the wheels. It's unclear whether you imagined a separate traction motor besides this.

mzso
mzso
65
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

vorticism wrote:
17 May 2023, 19:22
Honestly, Porsche's approach to motorsport seems the most intelligent sometimes.
In what way?

mzso
mzso
65
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Bill wrote:
27 May 2023, 07:58
AR3-GP wrote:
17 May 2023, 19:16
vorticism wrote:
17 May 2023, 19:11
First I've heard that the teams or FIA were considering a four cylinder for 2025/6.
The irony is that Porsche was competing in the WEC from 2014-2018 with a turbocharged V4....

The discussions were happening at a time when F1 was trying to get Porsche to join....and claimed to reset so that no one had a carry over advantage...despite Porsche having years of experience with a V4, MGU-H and MGU-K :lol:
IS not an mguh is just an electrical machine that produce electricity using gases from exhaust pipes.mguh is much much more than that and more complex and expensive.
That's pretty much what the MGU-H is. A dumb motor on the turbo shaft. The only addition is that it can act as a motor and spin up the turbine, which is trivial.

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

mzso wrote:
08 Jun 2023, 10:49
Bill wrote:
27 May 2023, 07:58
AR3-GP wrote:
17 May 2023, 19:16


The irony is that Porsche was competing in the WEC from 2014-2018 with a turbocharged V4....

The discussions were happening at a time when F1 was trying to get Porsche to join....and claimed to reset so that no one had a carry over advantage...despite Porsche having years of experience with a V4, MGU-H and MGU-K :lol:
IS not an mguh is just an electrical machine that produce electricity using gases from exhaust pipes.mguh is much much more than that and more complex and expensive.
That's pretty much what the MGU-H is. A dumb motor on the turbo shaft. The only addition is that it can act as a motor and spin up the turbine, which is trivial.
I think the complexities lay in the windings and the control strategy. The hardware seems pretty common.

Bill
Bill
8
Joined: 28 Apr 2018, 10:28

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Zynerji wrote:
08 Jun 2023, 17:26
mzso wrote:
08 Jun 2023, 10:49
Bill wrote:
27 May 2023, 07:58


IS not an mguh is just an electrical machine that produce electricity using gases from exhaust pipes.mguh is much much more than that and more complex and expensive.
That's pretty much what the MGU-H is. A dumb motor on the turbo shaft. The only addition is that it can act as a motor and spin up the turbine, which is trivial.
I think the complexities lay in the windings and the control strategy. The hardware seems pretty common.
no is not a dumb motor ,it can spin over 200000 rpm and work at a excess temperature of over 1000 degree celcius,it can recover energy ,deploy energy and work to overcome turbo lag .in a nutshell it work in extreme conditions which need high level knowledge in material science and big budget.a jet engine is just a big shaft with lots fans ,a rocket engine is just a hallow tube that burn rocket fuel but we all know is not that simply.

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

Bill wrote:
08 Jun 2023, 17:56
Zynerji wrote:
08 Jun 2023, 17:26
mzso wrote:
08 Jun 2023, 10:49


That's pretty much what the MGU-H is. A dumb motor on the turbo shaft. The only addition is that it can act as a motor and spin up the turbine, which is trivial.
I think the complexities lay in the windings and the control strategy. The hardware seems pretty common.
no is not a dumb motor ,it can spin over 200000 rpm and work at a excess temperature of over 1000 degree celcius,it can recover energy ,deploy energy and work to overcome turbo lag .in a nutshell it work in extreme conditions which need high level knowledge in material science and big budget.a jet engine is just a big shaft with lots fans ,a rocket engine is just a hallow tube that burn rocket fuel but we all know is not that simply.
Not impressed. Not at all. Fluid bearings, investment casting water jackets, Tesla cars open patents for best asynchronous motors of all time.

It's about the assembly, optimization of windings, and tuning the "harmonics" of the M->G->M control strategy.

The 2014 units while not as powerful as today's units would still be beneficial from a spec unit perspective, and probably way less expensive.