In what way could it possibly have been Ricciardo that caused it? He was on the edge of the track, he had no where to move to, and Rosberg cut across in front of him.iotar__ wrote:How was that not one-sided causing a collision by Ricciardo?????
He was in that position because he sent it up the inside from too far back with both front tyres locked up and barely made the corner. He wasn't under control where Rosberg was. Ergo it's his fault. Hamilton was partially locked up whilst defending, understeering and had nowhere to go as Ric went around him leaving no room. If it's Hamilton's fault then it's also Ric's.Moose wrote:In what way could it possibly have been Ricciardo that caused it? He was on the edge of the track, he had no where to move to, and Rosberg cut across in front of him.iotar__ wrote:How was that not one-sided causing a collision by Ricciardo?????
Exactly what was Ricciardo meant to do, and exactly which action did he take that "caused a collision"?
But he did make the corner, and was not out of control at that point. He was on the power, on the way out of the corner in complete control of the car. Rosberg just cut across in front.Just_a_fan wrote:He was in that position because he sent it up the inside from too far back with both front tyres locked up and barely made the corner.Moose wrote:In what way could it possibly have been Ricciardo that caused it? He was on the edge of the track, he had no where to move to, and Rosberg cut across in front of him.iotar__ wrote:How was that not one-sided causing a collision by Ricciardo?????
Exactly what was Ricciardo meant to do, and exactly which action did he take that "caused a collision"?
Even if you accept your explanation of events, then you're saying that Rosberg was in complete control of his car and chose to drive it straight into Ricciardo. That would make it his fault, not Ricciardo's.He wasn't under control where Rosberg was. Ergo it's his fault.