I must be logged in to view.. can you copy and paste the data here? -
edit: never mind...
n smikle wrote:Yeah, but he had a 2XWDC to fight over pole against. That now turns into the question of confidence in ones self. You know wondering, "Am I really faster than this guy? Can I beat him today?" Vettel doesn't have to worry about that aspect because he already knows he has Webber in his pocket when it comes to qualifying. A shining example of this was Kimi Raikkonen in 2009: Massa was dominating the qualifying and Kimi was lost at sea in the races in the first half of the season. However as soon as Massa fell out.... Kimi was back to full confidence and performing very well. So yeah, I think Having a fast if not faster driver in the other seat can cause you to over drive especially if that driver is not well composed or has some mental issues. And yes, Webber could be fast, but because Vettel is faster, Webber is more likle the one who is going to have to muster all his confidence and composure to put together a competitive lap - seems he just can't do that consistently nowadays.N12ck wrote:well yes, i suppose you could have said the same about hamilton in 2007 when he had probably the fastest car he could have been seen as the qualifying man, but as hes in a car thats slower or equal to the fastest car (not fastest) now we see he is a brilliant overtaker,n smikle wrote:You mean RedBull's one lap pace! lol... I think Vettel's strength is not pace, but actually composition - He is very composed on a one lap run. That calmness in qualifying is confidence that his machine is the best. IMO, If your car is slower you are not going to have that calm confidence - you would be ragging the car and over-driving.
...See what I did there, sneakily brought it back on topic
Oh come on... it's a turn of phrase. It means that you get more out of the car than any other F1 driver might get. It's normally applied to cars that aren't as fast as the competition, but where the driver makes up for the deficiency.flynfrog wrote:There is no way to out drive your car. The car can only provide x amount of grip you cant get more than that. Not that any one in this thread will care...
It's more than just about total grip levels though. It's about getting the car to do things it doesn't want to do and thus be quicker than the car would if driven "comfortably". When a car has a problem but the driver still gets good lap times then he is "out-driving the car", for example.flynfrog wrote:There is no way to out drive your car. The car can only provide x amount of grip you cant get more than that. Not that any one in this thread will care...
Exactly. Like Senna in a Toleman, or Alonso in a Minardi.beelsebob wrote:Oh come on... it's a turn of phrase. It means that you get more out of the car than any other F1 driver might get. It's normally applied to cars that aren't as fast as the competition, but where the driver makes up for the deficiency.flynfrog wrote:There is no way to out drive your car. The car can only provide x amount of grip you cant get more than that. Not that any one in this thread will care...
Yes, this is a technical forum and precise terms are great... but I'm pretty sure we all understand the meaning of this phrase.
Didn't find him all that spectacular back then.Giblet wrote:Alonso in a Minardi.
then maybe you could try proving it with data instead of this meaningless talk of over driving the car. was he using 98% of the grip level? What about how close was he to a theoretical perfect lap. If hes getting more out of then any other driver you mean his teammate as none of the other drivers are in the same car.beelsebob wrote:Oh come on... it's a turn of phrase. It means that you get more out of the car than any other F1 driver might get. It's normally applied to cars that aren't as fast as the competition, but where the driver makes up for the deficiency.flynfrog wrote:There is no way to out drive your car. The car can only provide x amount of grip you cant get more than that. Not that any one in this thread will care...
Yes, this is a technical forum and precise terms are great... but I'm pretty sure we all understand the meaning of this phrase.
Wasn't his team mate Alex Yoong?Giblet wrote:I his debut, he out-qualified his teammate by 2.6 seconds. He also qualified ahead of both Benettons on one occasion.
I'm not saying I was unimpressed. I was not impressed. FWIW Webbo's debut was more impressive and Justin Wilson probably too.His driving in the Minardi might not have been enough for you, but it was enough to impress everyone in Formula1 and put him on the radar.
Yes you are right.. but he was still getting his but kicked off a Fiery Massa! Good thing we didn't get to See Alonso dropping a hot 6 tenths all over him!Byronrhys wrote:
Cough* Raikkonen was actually leading qualifying cough*