Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the pits?

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
megz
1
Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 09:57
Location: New Zealand

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

Why an 18,000rpm limit? Why 4 slick tyres? Why no traction control? The rules are arbitrary and any reasoning behind them is the same. What is important is that the rules are the same for all competitors.

User avatar
Ray
2
Joined: 22 Nov 2006, 06:33
Location: Atlanta

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

megz wrote:Why an 18,000rpm limit? Why 4 slick tyres? Why no traction control? The rules are arbitrary and any reasoning behind them is the same. What is important is that the rules are the same for all competitors.
Easy dude. All I was asking is why the amount of fuel to be tested has to be such a large quantity. Surely any test that needs to be run can be done with a much smaller amount of fuel.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

Ray wrote:
megz wrote:Why an 18,000rpm limit? Why 4 slick tyres? Why no traction control? The rules are arbitrary and any reasoning behind them is the same. What is important is that the rules are the same for all competitors.
Easy dude. All I was asking is why the amount of fuel to be tested has to be such a large quantity. Surely any test that needs to be run can be done with a much smaller amount of fuel.
Just a standard rounded number for science experiments. You know, just easier to work with. The other day I sent some beverage samples to Germany to be tested by Krones and they required a one litre sample for probably the same arbitrary reason. I sent them 2 litres to be safe.
πŸ–οΈβœŒοΈβ˜οΈπŸ‘€πŸ‘ŒβœοΈπŸŽπŸ†πŸ™

Racing Green in 2028

User avatar
ParanoiD
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 17:42

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

n smikle wrote:
Ray wrote:
megz wrote:Why an 18,000rpm limit? Why 4 slick tyres? Why no traction control? The rules are arbitrary and any reasoning behind them is the same. What is important is that the rules are the same for all competitors.
Easy dude. All I was asking is why the amount of fuel to be tested has to be such a large quantity. Surely any test that needs to be run can be done with a much smaller amount of fuel.
Just a standard rounded number for science experiments. You know, just easier to work with. The other day I sent some beverage samples to Germany to be tested by Krones and they required a one litre sample for probably the same arbitrary reason. I sent them 2 litres to be safe.
Thank God they don't require that much for a blood test :lol:
Back to topic
Ay Carumba!

User avatar
Ray
2
Joined: 22 Nov 2006, 06:33
Location: Atlanta

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

Exactly! :lol: If 5cc's of blood is enough to detect all manner of things, surely Formula 1 with all it's superior tech and engineering can do the same (if not better). It really shouldn't be a whole liter of fuel to do a simple comparison with currently used fuel and the approved formula submitted at the beginning of the season.

lotus7
lotus7
1
Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 16:23

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

Ray wrote:
megz wrote:Why an 18,000rpm limit? Why 4 slick tyres? Why no traction control? The rules are arbitrary and any reasoning behind them is the same. What is important is that the rules are the same for all competitors.
Easy dude. All I was asking is why the amount of fuel to be tested has to be such a large quantity. Surely any test that needs to be run can be done with a much smaller amount of fuel.
I suppose "leftovers" from the 1 liter is kept for verification purposes. Like in sport drug sampling - always have a spare ready for a second test

User avatar
megz
1
Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 09:57
Location: New Zealand

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

Ray wrote:
megz wrote:Why an 18,000rpm limit? Why 4 slick tyres? Why no traction control? The rules are arbitrary and any reasoning behind them is the same. What is important is that the rules are the same for all competitors.
Easy dude. All I was asking is why the amount of fuel to be tested has to be such a large quantity. Surely any test that needs to be run can be done with a much smaller amount of fuel.
I didn't mean to come over as aggressive - my apologies - what I wanted to point out is that there is not necessarily a good reason for the rule except that that is it.

User avatar
Paul
11
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 19:33

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

.1L goes to laboratory, .9L go to Bernie's Merc- have you seen the gas prices recently?! Outrageous! #-o

User avatar
adrianjordan
24
Joined: 28 Feb 2010, 11:34
Location: West Yorkshire, England

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

megz wrote:what I wanted to point out is that there is not necessarily a good reason for the rule except that that is it.
Where the FiA is involved I'd go so far as to say that there is not usually a good reason for the rule....
Favourite driver: Lando Norris
Favourite team: McLaren

Turned down the chance to meet Vettel at Silverstone in 2007. He was a test driver at the time and I didn't think it was worth queuing!! πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

Re sample size.

It is possible to have 2 different fuels in a tank. Is it not possible to make the illegitimate fuel "float" above that of the legitmate fuel? Or vice versa?

Hence why I think they make it 1 litre. More chance of traces to be found for any illegitimate fuel.
More could have been done.
David Purley

Nando
Nando
2
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 02:30

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Re sample size.

It is possible to have 2 different fuels in a tank. Is it not possible to make the illegitimate fuel "float" above that of the legitmate fuel? Or vice versa?

Hence why I think they make it 1 litre. More chance of traces to be found for any illegitimate fuel.
How would you take advantage of the "floating fuel"?
You would have to use up all the normal fuel first and then when you leave a sample it would be all of the illegal fuel plus or minus some droplets of the legal one.
"Il Phenomeno" - The one they fear the most!

"2% of the world's population own 50% of the world's wealth."

Gatecrasher
Gatecrasher
4
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 04:54

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Re sample size.

It is possible to have 2 different fuels in a tank. Is it not possible to make the illegitimate fuel "float" above that of the legitmate fuel? Or vice versa?

Hence why I think they make it 1 litre. More chance of traces to be found for any illegitimate fuel.
Google BAR fuel cell... can't remember if collector tanks are still legal ? also it would be easy to have multiple pickups. It would be easy to change engine maps for different fuels but getting away with this would be highly unlikely.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Was 0.3 L of fuel + KERS enough to make it back to the p

Post

Collector tanks? If Mclaren had any sense that should have implemented one! haha.
Maybe a one way valve built into it so the whole tank can be drained from it, but the fuel pump cannot draw from it.
πŸ–οΈβœŒοΈβ˜οΈπŸ‘€πŸ‘ŒβœοΈπŸŽπŸ†πŸ™

Racing Green in 2028