Easy dude. All I was asking is why the amount of fuel to be tested has to be such a large quantity. Surely any test that needs to be run can be done with a much smaller amount of fuel.megz wrote:Why an 18,000rpm limit? Why 4 slick tyres? Why no traction control? The rules are arbitrary and any reasoning behind them is the same. What is important is that the rules are the same for all competitors.
Just a standard rounded number for science experiments. You know, just easier to work with. The other day I sent some beverage samples to Germany to be tested by Krones and they required a one litre sample for probably the same arbitrary reason. I sent them 2 litres to be safe.Ray wrote:Easy dude. All I was asking is why the amount of fuel to be tested has to be such a large quantity. Surely any test that needs to be run can be done with a much smaller amount of fuel.megz wrote:Why an 18,000rpm limit? Why 4 slick tyres? Why no traction control? The rules are arbitrary and any reasoning behind them is the same. What is important is that the rules are the same for all competitors.
Thank God they don't require that much for a blood testn smikle wrote:Just a standard rounded number for science experiments. You know, just easier to work with. The other day I sent some beverage samples to Germany to be tested by Krones and they required a one litre sample for probably the same arbitrary reason. I sent them 2 litres to be safe.Ray wrote:Easy dude. All I was asking is why the amount of fuel to be tested has to be such a large quantity. Surely any test that needs to be run can be done with a much smaller amount of fuel.megz wrote:Why an 18,000rpm limit? Why 4 slick tyres? Why no traction control? The rules are arbitrary and any reasoning behind them is the same. What is important is that the rules are the same for all competitors.
I suppose "leftovers" from the 1 liter is kept for verification purposes. Like in sport drug sampling - always have a spare ready for a second testRay wrote:Easy dude. All I was asking is why the amount of fuel to be tested has to be such a large quantity. Surely any test that needs to be run can be done with a much smaller amount of fuel.megz wrote:Why an 18,000rpm limit? Why 4 slick tyres? Why no traction control? The rules are arbitrary and any reasoning behind them is the same. What is important is that the rules are the same for all competitors.
I didn't mean to come over as aggressive - my apologies - what I wanted to point out is that there is not necessarily a good reason for the rule except that that is it.Ray wrote:Easy dude. All I was asking is why the amount of fuel to be tested has to be such a large quantity. Surely any test that needs to be run can be done with a much smaller amount of fuel.megz wrote:Why an 18,000rpm limit? Why 4 slick tyres? Why no traction control? The rules are arbitrary and any reasoning behind them is the same. What is important is that the rules are the same for all competitors.
Where the FiA is involved I'd go so far as to say that there is not usually a good reason for the rule....megz wrote:what I wanted to point out is that there is not necessarily a good reason for the rule except that that is it.
How would you take advantage of the "floating fuel"?JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Re sample size.
It is possible to have 2 different fuels in a tank. Is it not possible to make the illegitimate fuel "float" above that of the legitmate fuel? Or vice versa?
Hence why I think they make it 1 litre. More chance of traces to be found for any illegitimate fuel.
Google BAR fuel cell... can't remember if collector tanks are still legal ? also it would be easy to have multiple pickups. It would be easy to change engine maps for different fuels but getting away with this would be highly unlikely.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Re sample size.
It is possible to have 2 different fuels in a tank. Is it not possible to make the illegitimate fuel "float" above that of the legitmate fuel? Or vice versa?
Hence why I think they make it 1 litre. More chance of traces to be found for any illegitimate fuel.