AR3-GP wrote: ↑08 Jun 2026, 15:51
Albano:
The team refused a more complex and comprehensive measurement of the ADUO parameters. The fact that an engine that achieved two podiums turned out to be better than the one that won all the races and all the sprints puts, for me, a tombstone on how this regulation was written and should open someone's eyes to how damaging it is for a sport to give participants veto power over the rules, as well as to use simplistic parameters for complex decisions that shift millions in investments.
That #RedBull pulled off half a miracle with the engine can be seen from the start of the season; I've always ranked it second, sometimes close to #Mercedes in that regard. But that Mercedes isn't the best engine-wise with what we've seen so far doesn't reflect reality.
I'm sorry because many will drag Kimi into all this too, who dominated yesterday on a track where the engine counts for little or nothing.
because he knows what it means too. It's bad for the sport that the system failed so quickly.
https://x.com/Fred__18/status/2063911481838551085
It's a massive failure, the current dominating team has been granted ADUO while showing a clear advantage in electrical power, specially compared to Ferrari. I suppose it makes sense considering the tests are ICE only, but we don't know if the parameters are too simple and Mercedes may be hiding something from the test, not to mention the lack of testing on the MGU-K which might be much better than other teams.
But i digress, unless the Barcelona updates are a massive jump this season is already over for Ferrari, had a bit of hope that at least the constructors would be within reach in the future (kinda like 2024) with a better engine but i don't believe it now after Monaco.