Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑18 May 2025, 15:45Ocon's car wasnt on a dangerous place to warrant a VSC. Extremely suspicious.
Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑18 May 2025, 15:50Max in the meantime did not race with 30% less speed as he increased his distance during the VSC instead of the distance staying equal.
Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑18 May 2025, 15:54I noticed that he increased the distance during the VSC which shouldnt be possible since everyone is on the same speed. Is that legal?
How old are you ? 12 ?Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑18 May 2025, 15:57Emag I am pretty sure he increased the distance during VSC before he went to pit.
How hard is it for you to accept gracefully, when events occur in a way that you never wished to happen ?
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the McLaren car. One track where another car has 'matched up' and you start using words like 'downgrades' ? Driver error cost Mclaren the race - Oscar with L1T1, and Lando with his sub-optimal Q3 resulting in a non-front-row start. Things like that happen, they are humans. Not machines. Given the fact that both McLarens ran majority of their race in dirty air and still had matching laptimes to Max, proves that nothing is wrong with the car. Oscar drove for a long time within a sub 2s dirty air behind Max, and burnt his tyres prematurely. Lando was smarter with his usage of the mediums (which are actually softs, C5s). But it so happened that Redbull got their car setup absolutely right. So what ? the Mclaren was no slouch.