Do stewards care if it was the race engineer or the driver? I think not. That’s like not taking a penalty for unsafe release in the pit lane because the driver had nothing to do with it
Do stewards care if it was the race engineer or the driver? I think not. That’s like not taking a penalty for unsafe release in the pit lane because the driver had nothing to do with it
Penalty or not...44 is way too slow in the 2nd seat. Charles is carrying the entire team on his back. We need a sure replacement for 44. Oliver is around....
Lewis and charles have finished right next to eachother in the last two races and are 5th and 6th in the standings rn but sure sack him i guessJdn1327 wrote: ↑24 May 2025, 18:00Penalty or not...44 is way too slow in the 2nd seat. Charles is carrying the entire team on his back. We need a sure replacement for 44. Oliver is around....
People have dunked on Vasseur because he has phrased things somewhat "aggressively", in a tone which suggested criticism towards the drivers, but the thing is, he hasn't been wrong. There is potential in this car. Those couple of sessions where they were running with no (or little) compromise have proven that. If the suspension upgrade proves successful, we could see a resurgence from Ferrari in the second half of the season.FDD wrote: ↑24 May 2025, 18:04My opinion, since Monte Carlo does not has a lot fast curves GeS was able to run the SF25 low enough to generate fair amount of aero load and not to "eat" the skid block/board.
If this is a case then it is clear that SF25 has very good potential not exploited for obvious reasons as Vanja #66 explained.
Penalty for Hamilton? No, honestly, I don't think he'll get a penalty because Max was on his line and compared to this morning, they didn't put Antonelli and Ocon under investigation when there was a big accident for our car because we were in the same turn, so I don't think there will be anything.
shorter gearing in the lower gears - has always been the case, atleast in the GE era.