You do understand that 0 centimeters means that he simply crashed into it, what kind of precision are you talking about?
Which is what I said if you read what I wrote. He does not share, and that's what's expected. He cannot block the data either, even if he wanted to. The engineers decide what is disseminated to the drivers.Seanspeed wrote: ↑13 Jun 2025, 19:58That's like the default standard in F1. Drivers will typically not go out of their way to help their teammate. So long as Max isn't making any kind of fuss trying to block the other driver from getting his data, then nothing he's doing here is particularly selfish or abnormal.
No it means he brushed the wall just enough not to cause a major impact on the car.that data comes from official broadcast not me .precision in terms of steering inputs braking points and many decision that comes with driving an f1 car.felipe massa for example was known to take different line on the same corner which meant his laps were not consistent.
I think there' no upgrade here. Nothing in the FIA document, nor in the team's words or van Haren's articles. Maybe it'll come in Austria.
Nothing 'abnormal' - RB21 struggling with understeer in the slow chicanes, McLaren the class of the field (they did run 'future parts' experiments for entire FP1, that's how confident they are) in those chicanes (actually this track is nothing but 5-6 chicanes, 1 U-turn and the rest straights). Mercedes looks strong (close to McLaren) - they were hiding less in quali sims, but did hide more in race sims. LeClerc losing two sessions of practice because he thought 'doesn't matter I can still get back on track' despite locking up and sliding into the grass in one of the sector1 chicanes. Williams looking good as there are no meaningful corners on this track.
Lambiase spoke in Imola about the rear corner upgrade coming in/after a month so could be here or Austria. A cooling tube from the main body to the corners in hollow suspension arms should do the trick