ringo wrote:Toto's biggest mistake is that he is creating or forcing equal outcomes instead of creating equal opportunity for both drivers. This eventually leads to one driver feeling like he is being held back or not supported by the team.
Mercedes wants driver x and driver y to reach point A at the same time by, giving different and unequal strategies, to do battle for the win. However they are not giving equal strategy to maximize the potential of the drivers.
They are too obsessed with leveling outcomes and not equal opportunity. It can come back to haunt them, as i feel redbull and williams will be getting more wins this year.
I don't see that being the case at all.
Toto cannot force equal outcomes if he tried, as both cannot finish first. What is the issue is
competitiveness.
Rosberg has done a magnificent job thus far of leading the WDC, when any sensible betting man would've had Hamilton.
Hamilton's efforts have been curtailed by misfortune, although Rosberg has suffered some to Hamilton's benefit.
What is happening in my view, is transparency
to the drivers. They can and are being allowed to race, which is markedly different from what we have seen WCC teams do in recent years.
Problems will arise from having 2 driver's in the team fighting for a title. You cannot cover every eventuality for the drivers to be appeased by the team's decisions.
One guy is going to be happy, and the other is gonna be unhappy.
Put it this way, will Hamilton be happy to be outscored by his team-mate? No.
Will Rosberg be happy to be beaten(generally) by Hamilton when all things are "equal"(reliability issues)? No.
Managing this situation perfectly is impossible without 1 driver losing face.
And should they lose a couple races due to this duel, then at least some semblance of competition is made possible by virtue of the team allowing these guys to race.
OR...they could always do it the Red Bull way.
I know which I prefer.