Somewhere in the 80s, Keith Duckworth of Cosworth had this idea of a pure fuel-flow formula, then run with whatever you like?
Qs;
. Would such a formula work today?
- What would the most efficient solution be, petrol only?
Do you mean petrol but not Diesel, or do you exclude ERS as well?xpensive wrote:Somewhere in the 80s, Keith Duckworth of Cosworth had this idea of a pure fuel-flow formula, then run with whatever you like?
Qs;
. Would such a formula work today?
- What would the most efficient solution be, petrol only?
40 g/sec should yield some 900Hp, just about right if you ask me.CBeck113 wrote:That sounds crazy....I like it!
- yes it would work, although top speed may be a bit too slow with 40g/s
...
Thanks for the correction X, I was so focused on this year's 100g/min that I read it without thinking. In that case I think even 30g and a two stroke would be pretty huge, even if it is limited by knocking. I need my formulas to do some calculating, so I'll throw some numbers and get back tonight...xpensive wrote:40 g/sec should yield some 900Hp, just about right if you ask me.CBeck113 wrote:That sounds crazy....I like it!
- yes it would work, although top speed may be a bit too slow with 40g/s
...
You also need to get your units straightCBeck113 wrote:Thanks for the correction X, I was so focused on this year's 100g/min that I read it without thinking. In that case I think even 30g and a two stroke would be pretty huge, even if it is limited by knocking. I need my formulas to do some calculating, so I'll throw some numbers and get back tonight...xpensive wrote:40 g/sec should yield some 900Hp, just about right if you ask me.CBeck113 wrote:That sounds crazy....I like it!
- yes it would work, although top speed may be a bit too slow with 40g/s
...
I would build a 3L-V8 with twin turbo.xpensive wrote:If Gasoline is 44.4 MJ (MWs) per kg means that at 40 g/sec, 1780 kW, or 2400 Hp, of power is going into the ICE.
Now, what would be the best way to make use of that?
I don't think you can look away from pressure charging if you want the most efficient engine (which of course you do).xpensive wrote:If Gasoline is 44.4 MJ (MWs) per kg means that at 40 g/sec, 1780 kW, or 2400 Hp, of power is going into the ICE.
Now, what would be the best way to make use of that?
If you aaare not using ERS then you could use two smaller turbos to get around teh spooling issue.Holm86 wrote:I don't think you can look away from pressure charging if you want the most efficient engine (which of course you do).xpensive wrote:If Gasoline is 44.4 MJ (MWs) per kg means that at 40 g/sec, 1780 kW, or 2400 Hp, of power is going into the ICE.
Now, what would be the best way to make use of that?
But if we are not using any ERS systems, the engine would displacement wise be a compromise of large displacement (so the turbine won't be too slow to spool) and small displacement (to get less friction).
But ideally the engine should run at as low rpm as possible, with small displacement, and very high boost pressure??
That's teh whole idea of a fuel flow formula.Tim.Wright wrote:How bout a power limited formula?
Torque sensor on each driveshaft, use the existing wheel speed sensors, and then do what you want upstream.
Except it doesn't restrict you to a petrol ICE as the only alternative...wuzak wrote:That's teh whole idea of a fuel flow formula.Tim.Wright wrote:How bout a power limited formula?
Torque sensor on each driveshaft, use the existing wheel speed sensors, and then do what you want upstream.