Andres125sx wrote:
To me the three greats are indeed greats, but my rating has changed during past seasons. I struggled to accept Vettel in this group, but he´s proved to deserve it. OTOH Lewis has proved to be not too reliable, he mekes more mistakes than he should.
The whole points per race and podia per race stats show he is actually extremely reliable. He had one bad year, 2011, where he went la-la but other than that he's bagged points and podia almost metronomically.
He's had a number of incidents with team mates because, unlike Vettel and Schuie and Alonso, he's driven against strong team mates most of his career. Likewise Senna and Prost. Indeed Prost ended up vetoing Senna later in their career at Williams because he knew how strong Senna was.
What people don't like about Hamilton is that he is gobby and rappy and tattooed etc. He's arrogant and full of his own ability. He knows he's good and he's comfortable with it.
What he isn't is political. On the odd times he's tried to be, he's made a mess of it. Schuie, Prost, Alonso, Vettel are all examples of political drivers. They win as many races in the garage as on the track. Hamilton, like Senna and Mansell, just lets his driving do the talking, they're "ego drivers" if you will: their speed comes from their self belief. He's learnt to do that following 2011 and that change has been called "maturity" by some commentators. That's what makes Rosberg's job so difficult. Rosberg is a political driver too, in my opinion, and like Prost before him, he's finding it difficult to beat the "ego driver" on the other side of the garage.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.