for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
Xwang
29
Joined: 02 Dec 2012, 11:12

for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

Hi,
I would like to know for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car.
Is it only for pneumatic valves or it serves other systems too?

NL_Fer
82
Joined: 15 Jun 2014, 09:48

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

They don’t need pneumatic valvesprings for current engine rpm’s.

Xwang
29
Joined: 02 Dec 2012, 11:12

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

NL_Fer wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 18:39
They don’t need pneumatic valvesprings for current engine rpm’s.
I thought the same, but I think that they have kept them anyway.
I'm wrong? Are they using springs or desmodronic systems instead?

saviour stivala
51
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

Yes, all four manufacturers are still using air valves.

Dr. Acula
46
Joined: 28 Jul 2018, 13:23

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

NL_Fer wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 18:39
They don’t need pneumatic valvesprings for current engine rpm’s.
No they don't rpm vise. But as far as i know pneumatic valve springs can be set up relatively soft compared to a mechanical spring for the same rpm/valve setup. So they end up with a few extra horses by still using them.

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

Dr. Acula wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 23:50
NL_Fer wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 18:39
They don’t need pneumatic valvesprings for current engine rpm’s.
No they don't rpm vise. But as far as i know pneumatic valve springs can be set up relatively soft compared to a mechanical spring for the same rpm/valve setup. So they end up with a few extra horses by still using them.
Do they 'release' the pressure as the cam lobe rises? if there is no (or little, plus the pressure in the cylinder) resistance, it must save a huge amount of lost power in both force and friction. I had never considered this before. It only needs to stop the valve dropping off its seat until it 'follows' the close profile. Would the air be quick enough venting to do this?
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

63l8qrrfy6
368
Joined: 17 Feb 2016, 21:36

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

Big Tea wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 23:56
Dr. Acula wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 23:50
NL_Fer wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 18:39
They don’t need pneumatic valvesprings for current engine rpm’s.
No they don't rpm vise. But as far as i know pneumatic valve springs can be set up relatively soft compared to a mechanical spring for the same rpm/valve setup. So they end up with a few extra horses by still using them.
Do they 'release' the pressure as the cam lobe rises? if there is no (or little, plus the pressure in the cylinder) resistance, it must save a huge amount of lost power in both force and friction. I had never considered this before. It only needs to stop the valve dropping off its seat until it 'follows' the close profile. Would the air be quick enough venting to do this?
Not based on what has been published to date - they only have a PRV that opens when pressure increases from oil accumulation in the pneumatic volume. This doesn't happen every cycle.

I see what you are saying though - the pressure requirement peaks when valve acceleration is at its maximum on the opening ramp however the peak pressure inside the "air spring" peaks at maximum lift which means that there is a portion of the cycle where the air spring pressure exceeds the pressure requirement. This is just wasted power.
I am not aware of any current means of mitigating this but here could be a few practical solutions.

63l8qrrfy6
368
Joined: 17 Feb 2016, 21:36

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

saviour stivala wrote:
29 Jun 2019, 20:09
Yes, all four manufacturers are still using air valves.
Honda seemed to suggest they were using regular coil springs if I remember correctly ?

gruntguru
563
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 07:43

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

I would think pneumatic valve springs would still have benefits on lower speed engines. Two that come to mind are:
1. Spring force variable to suit the rpm - softer at low rpm reduces valve train friction.
2. More aggressive valve acceleration - faster opening and closing permits more area under the lift curve or shorter duration for a given lift x time area.
je suis charlie

Maritimer
19
Joined: 06 Sep 2017, 21:45
Location: Canada

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

Gear shift is pneumatic is it not?

kebab
3
Joined: 16 Mar 2009, 08:24

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

Maritimer wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 06:36
Gear shift is pneumatic is it not?
Gear shift is hydraulic if I remember correctly

NL_Fer
82
Joined: 15 Jun 2014, 09:48

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

If the pneumatic pressure can vary the valve return, maybe they can use it as a variable valve timing?

Jolle
132
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

NL_Fer wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 11:53
If the pneumatic pressure can vary the valve return, maybe they can use it as a variable valve timing?
If they would have a shift cam kind of thing, it would be hydraulic. Pneumatic is used for stuff that needs to be compressed, like indeed instead of valve springs.
So from the top of my head I can’t think of anything beyond the valves that need pneumatic power.

63l8qrrfy6
368
Joined: 17 Feb 2016, 21:36

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

gruntguru wrote:
30 Jun 2019, 04:55
I would think pneumatic valve springs would still have benefits on lower speed engines. Two that come to mind are:
1. Spring force variable to suit the rpm - softer at low rpm reduces valve train friction.
2. More aggressive valve acceleration - faster opening and closing permits more area under the lift curve or shorter duration for a given lift x time area.
Regarding point 1 - the rules specify a mechanical pressure regulator with a single set pressure at the pneumatic bottle outlet. To me this sounds like they have to set the pressure for the highest engine speed plus some margin.

But then again teams are so good at going around the rules - I would not be surprised if they somehow manage to vary the pressure with RPM.

saviour stivala
51
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: for what purposes is the pneumatic system used on a F1 car?

Post

I do not know of any system on a formula one car that uses pneumatic/pressured air system for its function apart from the engine valves return system (PVRS).
The advantages of PVRS can never be meet with a wire coil spring system.
The amount of ‘seat’ tension required to keep a wire coil sprung valve under control results in greater peak lift loading. Resulting in added stress to the entire valvetrain. A pneumatic system, sharing a common reservoir of pressure retain a more static level of force, controlling the valve effectively, without any attendant peak lift loading increase.
The previous 3.0-litre NA V10 having 40 valves and running at 18000 rpm used a 0.7 litre reservoir and a pressure of 200 bar.