I have definitely felt this as well...
The drivers who raced with the concrete tyres openly talk about their fuel saving. It's quicker to carry less weight and fuel save than it is to carry more fuel. The only way around it is to mandate a high minimum amount of fuel carried.komninosm wrote: ↑13 Jul 2020, 01:00They don't fill up the cars because they cannot use the extra fuel, because the tires overheat. It's a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Also filling up the whole fuel load would make the car heavy and slow (and is bad on tires too). While half-filling up during pit stops would not have that problem. You would use your whole fuel allotment too.
So Refueling is far from the worst thing F1 could reintroduce.
Either the cars all use the optimal strategy, or they finish the race more slowly than their competitors. The only reason you see variations at the moment is people gambling. That's not strategy, that's luck.komninosm wrote: ↑13 Jul 2020, 01:00"We don't need more pit stops" is just your opinion. Some people do enjoy the strategy part of F1 too, not just the racing on track. Besides, this will also give you more on track action/battles as the cars will be on different strategies and have to overtake more (and it will be easier too). Less processions.
Why not just make a rule that you have to do two pitstops and/or use three different compounds of tyre in a dry Grand Prix? Wouldn't that achieve the same result of spicing up strategies?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑13 Jul 2020, 00:27Stop a second time and you are 25 seconds behind where you were with the trye advantage not enough to make it up.
To reduce that punishment.
My solution was to bring back refuelling
Should have signed for Mercedes.
Yes, 2020, w11. They were taller than they supposed to be.holeindalip wrote: ↑13 Jul 2020, 03:13Didn’t Red Bull protest Mercedes and racing points brake ducts in Australia already because the opening was in the wrong place on the rears? If true then the brake ducts have been modified from stock spec and won’t match, or did that happen last year? I’ve slept since then.....
foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑13 Jul 2020, 03:17Yes, 2020, w11. They were taller than they supposed to be.holeindalip wrote: ↑13 Jul 2020, 03:13Didn’t Red Bull protest Mercedes and racing points brake ducts in Australia already because the opening was in the wrong place on the rears? If true then the brake ducts have been modified from stock spec and won’t match, or did that happen last year? I’ve slept since then.....
Well, he probably realizes first 3 races were the best chances RebBull has and so far doesn't look good at all. I think Mercedes can win all races bar engine failures... What type of circuit Mugello?
I dont remember what RP did. w11 has definitely changed the design though.holeindalip wrote: ↑13 Jul 2020, 03:20foxmulder_ms wrote: ↑13 Jul 2020, 03:17Yes, 2020, w11. They were taller than they supposed to be.holeindalip wrote: ↑13 Jul 2020, 03:13Didn’t Red Bull protest Mercedes and racing points brake ducts in Australia already because the opening was in the wrong place on the rears? If true then the brake ducts have been modified from stock spec and won’t match, or did that happen last year? I’ve slept since then.....
I remember racing point had to change theirs also, am I wrong there????
Mostly fast chicanes and double apex corners.foxmulder_ms wrote:Well, he probably realizes first 3 races were the best chances RebBull has and so far doesn't look good at all. I think Mercedes can win all races bar engine failures... What type of circuit Mugello?
It seems like the W11 has a significant tire life advantage over the RB-16 right now. Some of that might be down to the cooler temps and setup but I think the fact the Lewis was able to punch in the fastest lap (at the time) on 35 lap old mediums was a good sign of Merc's advantage.
There is an entire car's worth of parts requiring clarification.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑13 Jul 2020, 00:34@ the Renault protest. Perhaps Renault is seeking clarification to know if they can copy Mercedes Brake ducts too!